IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v183y2024ics1366554524000383.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blockchain adoption for combating remanufacturing perceived risks in a reverse supply chain

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Manman
  • Yang, Feng
  • Shan, Feifei
  • Guo, Yu

Abstract

Remanufacturing provides excellent opportunities for socially responsible firms to achieve sustainable operations, benefiting manufacturers, consumers, and the environment. However, the market for remanufactured products faces challenges due to perceived risks, with consumers often expressing concerns about the quality and provenance of remanufactured parts. The advent of blockchain technology offers a promising solution for reverse supply chain players to manage these perceived risks. This study develops a game-theoretical model to investigate the incentives of reverse supply chain players to adopt blockchain technology to mitigate remanufacturing perceived risk. We examine consumer preferences for new and remanufactured products under different blockchain adoption strategies. Our findings indicate that choosing an appropriate blockchain adoption strategy can increase the remanufacturing rate. However, blockchain adoption does not necessarily expand market share. The optimal blockchain adoption strategy is determined by quality distrust and unit blockchain cost. When quality distrust is low and the unit blockchain cost is intermediate, investing in blockchain technology for new products can result in a triple-win outcome for the OEM, the recycler, and the environment. If quality distrust is high and the unit blockchain cost is not excessive, investing in blockchain technology for remanufactured products can also lead to a triple-win outcome. However, when both factors are low, no blockchain adoption strategy benefits the recycler or the environment, and there is a risk of the OEM overinvesting. We further investigate the effects of heterogeneous blockchain adoption costs, government regulations, and endogenized pricing by a third party on triple-win regions. This study offers valuable insights for reverse supply chain players on how to leverage emerging technologies to address remanufacturing perceived risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Manman & Yang, Feng & Shan, Feifei & Guo, Yu, 2024. "Blockchain adoption for combating remanufacturing perceived risks in a reverse supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:183:y:2024:i:c:s1366554524000383
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2024.103448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554524000383
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103448?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niu, Baozhuang & Ruan, Yiyuan & Zeng, Fanzhuo, 2022. "Promoting remanufacturing through subsidy and environment tax: Channel co-opetition, incentive alignment and regulation optimization," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    2. Liangchuan Zhou & Surendra M. Gupta, 2020. "Value depreciation factors for new and remanufactured high-technology products: a case study on iPhones and iPads," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(23), pages 7218-7249, December.
    3. Bin Shen & Ciwei Dong & Stefan Minner, 2022. "Combating Copycats in the Supply Chain with Permissioned Blockchain Technology," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 138-154, January.
    4. Volodymyr Babich & Gilles Hilary, 2020. "OM Forum—Distributed Ledgers and Operations: What Operations Management Researchers Should Know About Blockchain Technology," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 223-245, March.
    5. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Guo, Shu & Liu, Na & Shi, Xiutian, 2020. "Optimal pricing in on-demand-service-platform-operations with hired agents and risk-sensitive customers in the blockchain era," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 1031-1042.
    6. Gökçe Esenduran & Eda Kemahlıoğlu-Ziya & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2017. "Impact of Take-Back Regulation on the Remanufacturing Industry," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(5), pages 924-944, May.
    7. Niu, Baozhuang & Dong, Jian & Liu, Yaoqi, 2021. "Incentive alignment for blockchain adoption in medicine supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    8. Zhang, Y & Hong, Z & Chen, Z & Glock, C. H., 2020. "Tax or subsidy? Design and selection of regulatory policies for remanufacturing," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 122326, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    9. Yang, Lei & Gao, Muyi & Feng, Lipan, 2022. "Competition versus cooperation? Which is better in a remanufacturing supply chain considering blockchain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    10. Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2019. "Blockchain-technology-supported platforms for diamond authentication and certification in luxury supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 17-29.
    11. Jiri Chod & Nikolaos Trichakis & Gerry Tsoukalas & Henry Aspegren & Mark Weber, 2020. "On the Financing Benefits of Supply Chain Transparency and Blockchain Adoption," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4378-4396, October.
    12. Dutta, Pankaj & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Somani, Surabhi & Butala, Richa, 2020. "Blockchain technology in supply chain operations: Applications, challenges and research opportunities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    13. James D. Abbey & Rainer Kleber & Gilvan C. Souza & Guido Voigt, 2017. "The Role of Perceived Quality Risk in Pricing Remanufactured Products," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(1), pages 100-115, January.
    14. Tsan-Ming Choi, 2021. "Creating all-win by blockchain technology in supply chains: Impacts of agents’ risk attitudes towards cryptocurrency," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(11), pages 2580-2595, November.
    15. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Luo, Suyuan, 2019. "Data quality challenges for sustainable fashion supply chain operations in emerging markets: Roles of blockchain, government sponsors and environment taxes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 139-152.
    16. Yu-Chung Tsao & Thuy-Linh Vu, 2022. "A decentralized microgrid considering blockchain adoption and credit risk," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(9), pages 2116-2128, October.
    17. Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2019. "Extended consumer responsibility: Syncretic value-oriented pricing strategies for trade-in-for-upgrade programs," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 350-367.
    18. Zhong, Yuanguang & Yang, Tong & Yu, Huilin & Zhong, Shuneng & Xie, Wei, 2023. "Impacts of blockchain technology with government subsidies on a dual-channel supply chain for tracing product information," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    19. Hubert Pun & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan & Pengwen Hou, 2021. "Blockchain Adoption for Combating Deceptive Counterfeits," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(4), pages 864-882, April.
    20. Lingxiu Dong & Puping (Phil) Jiang & Fasheng Xu, 2023. "Impact of Traceability Technology Adoption in Food Supply Chain Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 1518-1535, March.
    21. Xiaoming Yan & Xiuli Chao & Ye Lu & Sean X. Zhou, 2017. "Optimal Policies for Selling New and Remanufactured Products," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(9), pages 1746-1759, September.
    22. Özden Tozanlı & Elif Kongar & Surendra M. Gupta, 2020. "Trade-in-to-upgrade as a marketing strategy in disassembly-to-order systems at the edge of blockchain technology," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(23), pages 7183-7200, December.
    23. Yang, Feng & Wang, Manman & Ang, Sheng, 2021. "Optimal remanufacturing decisions in supply chains considering consumers’ anticipated regret and power structures," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    24. Xu, Xiaoping & Yan, Luling & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Cheng, T.C.E., 2023. "When Is It Wise to Use Blockchain for Platform Operations with Remanufacturing?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1073-1090.
    25. R. Canan Savaskan & Shantanu Bhattacharya & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2004. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 239-252, February.
    26. Vishal V. Agrawal & Atalay Atasu & Koert van Ittersum, 2015. "Remanufacturing, Third-Party Competition, and Consumers' Perceived Value of New Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 60-72, January.
    27. Li, Qingying & Ma, Manqiong & Shi, Tianqin & Zhu, Chen, 2022. "Green investment in a sustainable supply chain: The role of blockchain and fairness," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    28. R. Canan Savaskan & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2006. "Reverse Channel Design: The Case of Competing Retailers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 1-14, January.
    29. Niu, Baozhuang & Xu, Haotao & Chen, Lei, 2022. "Creating all-win by blockchain in a remanufacturing supply chain with consumer risk-aversion and quality untrust," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    30. Erin C. McKie & Mark E. Ferguson & Michael R. Galbreth & Sriram Venkataraman, 2018. "How Do Consumers Choose between Multiple Product Generations and Conditions? An Empirical Study of iPad Sales on eBay," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(8), pages 1574-1594, August.
    31. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Wen, Xin & Sun, Xuting & Chung, Sai-Ho, 2019. "The mean-variance approach for global supply chain risk analysis with air logistics in the blockchain technology era," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 178-191.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Xiaoping & Yan, Luling & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Cheng, T.C.E., 2023. "When Is It Wise to Use Blockchain for Platform Operations with Remanufacturing?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1073-1090.
    2. Cao, Yu & Yi, Chaoqun & Wan, Guangyu & Hu, Hanli & Li, Qingsong & Wang, Shouyang, 2022. "An analysis on the role of blockchain-based platforms in agricultural supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    3. Niu, Baozhuang & Xu, Haotao & Chen, Lei, 2022. "Creating all-win by blockchain in a remanufacturing supply chain with consumer risk-aversion and quality untrust," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    4. Li, Qingying & Ma, Manqiong & Shi, Tianqin & Zhu, Chen, 2022. "Green investment in a sustainable supply chain: The role of blockchain and fairness," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    5. Niu, Baozhuang & Ruan, Yiyuan & Xu, Haotao, 2023. "Turn a blind eye? E-tailer's blockchain participation considering upstream competition between copycats and brands," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    6. Li, Zhiwen & Xu, Xianhao & Bai, Qingguo & Guan, Xu & Zeng, Kuan, 2021. "The interplay between blockchain adoption and channel selection in combating counterfeits," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    7. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Siqin, Tana, 2022. "Blockchain in logistics and production from Blockchain 1.0 to Blockchain 5.0: An intra-inter-organizational framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    8. Liu, Shuai & Hua, Guowei & Kang, Yuxuan & Edwin Cheng, T.C. & Xu, Yadong, 2022. "What value does blockchain bring to the imported fresh food supply chain?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    9. Zhang, Tianyu & Dong, Peiwu & Chen, Xiangfeng & Gong, Yu, 2023. "The impacts of blockchain adoption on a dual-channel supply chain with risk-averse members," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    10. Chu, Xiang & Wang, Rui & Lin, Yan & Li, Yantong, 2022. "Building trust in online trade-in programs with a blockchain-enabled system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    11. Zhou, Yu & Gao, Xiang & Luo, Suyuan & Xiong, Yu & Ye, Niangyue, 2022. "Anti-Counterfeiting in a retail Platform: A Game-Theoretic approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    12. Ma, Deqing & Hu, Jinsong, 2022. "The optimal combination between blockchain and sales format in an internet platform-based closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    13. Niu, Baozhuang & Dong, Jian & Liu, Yaoqi, 2021. "Incentive alignment for blockchain adoption in medicine supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    14. Li, Zhiwen & Xu, Xianhao & Bai, Qingguo & Chen, Cheng & Wang, Hongwei & Xia, Peng, 2023. "Implications of information sharing on blockchain adoption in reducing carbon emissions: A mean–variance analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    15. Yang, Feng & Wang, Manman & Ang, Sheng, 2021. "Optimal remanufacturing decisions in supply chains considering consumers’ anticipated regret and power structures," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    16. De-Qing Ma & Xiao-Qing Wang & Xue Wang & Jin-Song Hu, 2023. "Achieving Triple Benefits in a Platform-Based Closed-Loop Supply Chain: The Optimal Combination between Recycling Channel and Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-40, February.
    17. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Ouyang, Xu, 2021. "Initial coin offerings for blockchain based product provenance authentication platforms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    18. Liu, Samuel Shuai & Hua, Guowei & Ma, Benedict Jun & Cheng, T.C.E., 2023. "Competition between green and non-green products in the blockchain era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    19. Cao, Yifan & Shen, Bin, 2022. "Adopting blockchain technology to block less sustainable products’ entry in global trade," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    20. Biswas, Debajyoti & Jalali, Hamed & Ansaripoor, Amir H. & De Giovanni, Pietro, 2023. "Traceability vs. sustainability in supply chains: The implications of blockchain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 128-147.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:183:y:2024:i:c:s1366554524000383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.