IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v181y2024ics136655452300354x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pricing and quality decisions for standardized and collaborative services in a home health care service platform

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Lijun
  • Yang, Fanjie
  • Lin, Meiyan
  • Xue, Weili

Abstract

Home health care service platforms (HHCSPs) serve older consumers by gathering informal caregivers who offer standardized care services and/or collaborative care services. These platforms aim to maximize both profit and consumer surplus by motivating participants to make proper price and quality decisions. Service prices can be determined by an HHCSP or an informal caregiver, leading to four scenarios: standardized service pricing by platform (PLS scenario), standardized service pricing by informal caregiver (ICS scenario), collaborative service pricing by platform (PLC scenario), and collaborative service pricing by informal caregiver (ICC scenario). We develop an analytical model to examine the service price and quality decisions based on these four scenarios. We find that the preferred scenarios of the HHCSP and the informal caregiver are those in which they can take the power of pricing. In most cases, the preferred scenario of the informal caregiver (HHCSP) will more likely evolve from the ICCPLC scenario to the ICSPLS scenario as the informal caregiver becomes more efficient. The HHCSP focusing on consumer surplus may not help generate many more economic benefits. Social welfare can be maximized under the ICS, PLS and PLC scenarios, while it is always lowest under the ICC scenario. In addition, we propose two contracts to increase collaboration between platforms and informal caregivers. The findings are robust in two extensions where both categories of service coexist and where the service rate affects the market demand.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Lijun & Yang, Fanjie & Lin, Meiyan & Xue, Weili, 2024. "Pricing and quality decisions for standardized and collaborative services in a home health care service platform," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:181:y:2024:i:c:s136655452300354x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2023.103366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136655452300354X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2023.103366?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gérard P. Cachon & Kaitlin M. Daniels & Ruben Lobel, 2017. "The Role of Surge Pricing on a Service Platform with Self-Scheduling Capacity," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 368-384, July.
    2. Hsueh, Che-Fu, 2014. "Improving corporate social responsibility in a supply chain through a new revenue sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 214-222.
    3. Terry A. Taylor, 2018. "On-Demand Service Platforms," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 704-720, October.
    4. Avinadav, Tal & Chernonog, Tatyana & Fruchter, Gila E. & Prasad, Ashutosh, 2020. "Contract design when quality is co-created in a supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 908-918.
    5. Ioannis Bellos & Stylianos Kavadias, 2019. "When Should Customers Control Service Delivery? Implications for Service Design," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(4), pages 890-907, April.
    6. Guillaume Roels & Uday S. Karmarkar & Scott Carr, 2010. "Contracting for Collaborative Services," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 849-863, May.
    7. Adams, Christopher P., 2006. "Optimal team incentives with CES production," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 143-148, July.
    8. Guillaume Roels, 2014. "Optimal Design of Coproductive Services: Interaction and Work Allocation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 578-594, October.
    9. Qin, Xuelian & Liu, Zhixue & Tian, Lin, 2021. "The optimal combination between selling mode and logistics service strategy in an e-commerce market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 639-651.
    10. Bolton, Ruth & Saxena-Iyer, Shruti, 2009. "Interactive Services: A Framework, Synthesis and Research Directions," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 91-104.
    11. Madeline Powell & Alex Gillett & Bob Doherty, 2019. "Sustainability in social enterprise: hybrid organizing in public services," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 159-186, February.
    12. Liu, Wei-hua & Xie, Dong & Xu, Xue-cai, 2013. "Quality supervision and coordination of logistic service supply chain under multi-period conditions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 353-361.
    13. Xianyi Wang & Xiaofang Wang & Hui He, 2021. "Contracts to Coordinate Healthcare Providers in the Telemedicine Referral System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-25, September.
    14. Xiong, Jie & Zuo, Meiyun, 2022. "Understanding factors influencing the adoption of a mobile platform of medical and senior care in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    15. Lou, Yaqi & Feng, Lipan & He, Shuguang & He, Zhen & Zhao, Xiukun, 2020. "Logistics service outsourcing choices in a retailer-led supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    16. Panda, Shibaji, 2014. "Coordination of a socially responsible supply chain using revenue sharing contract," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 92-104.
    17. Dimitrios A. Andritsos & Christopher S. Tang, 2018. "Incentive Programs for Reducing Readmissions when Patient Care is Co†Produced," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(6), pages 999-1020, June.
    18. Yuyan Wang & Zhaoqing Yu & Liang Shen, 2019. "Study on the decision-making and coordination of an e-commerce supply chain with manufacturer fairness concerns," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(9), pages 2788-2808, May.
    19. Yu, Jianjun & Fang, Yanli & Zhong, Yuanguang & Zhang, Xiong & Zhang, Ruijie, 2022. "Pricing and quality strategies for an on-demand housekeeping platform with customer-intensive services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    20. Sun, Luoyi & Hua, Guowei & Cheng, T.C.E. & Wang, Yixiao, 2020. "How to price 3D-printed products? Pricing strategy for 3D printing platforms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    21. Wang, Xiaolei & He, Fang & Yang, Hai & Oliver Gao, H., 2016. "Pricing strategies for a taxi-hailing platform," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 212-231.
    22. Alex Gillett & Kim Loader & Bob Doherty & Jonathan M. Scott, 2016. "A multi-organizational cross-sectoral collaboration: empirical evidence from an 'Empty Homes' project," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 15-22, January.
    23. Yoo, Seung Ho & Choi, Thomas Y. & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2021. "Electric vehicles and product–service platforms: Now and in future," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    24. Liu, Weihua & Yan, Xiaoyu & Wei, Wanying & Xie, Dong, 2019. "Pricing decisions for service platform with provider’s threshold participating quantity, value-added service and matching ability," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 410-432.
    25. Hsiao†Hui Lee & Cuihong Li, 2018. "Supplier Quality Management: Investment, Inspection, and Incentives," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(2), pages 304-322, February.
    26. Lin, Meiyan & Ma, Lijun & Ying, Chengshuo, 2021. "Matching daily home health-care demands with supply in service-sharing platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    27. Xu, Xiaoping & Zhang, Mian & He, Ping, 2020. "Coordination of a supply chain with online platform considering delivery time decision," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    28. Kung, Ling-Chieh & Zhong, Guan-Yu, 2017. "The optimal pricing strategy for two-sided platform delivery in the sharing economy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1-12.
    29. Stanley Baiman & Paul E. Fischer & Madhav V. Rajan, 2001. "Performance Measurement and Design in Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 173-188, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He, Shan & Dai, Ying & Ma, Zu-Jun, 2023. "To offer or not to offer? The optimal value-insured strategy for crowdsourced delivery platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Yu, Jianjun & Fang, Yanli & Zhong, Yuanguang & Zhang, Xiong & Zhang, Ruijie, 2022. "Pricing and quality strategies for an on-demand housekeeping platform with customer-intensive services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    3. He, Bo & Mirchandani, Prakash & Wang, Yong, 2020. "Removing barriers for grocery stores: O2O platform and self-scheduling delivery capacity," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    4. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Guo, Shu & Liu, Na & Shi, Xiutian, 2020. "Optimal pricing in on-demand-service-platform-operations with hired agents and risk-sensitive customers in the blockchain era," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(3), pages 1031-1042.
    5. Siqin, Tana & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chung, Sai-Ho, 2022. "Optimal E-tailing channel structure and service contracting in the platform era," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    6. Hou, Ting & Zhang, Wen, 2021. "Optimal two-stage elimination contests for crowdsourcing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    7. Choi, Tsan-Ming & Guo, Shu & Liu, Na & Shi, Xiutian, 2019. "Values of food leftover sharing platforms in the sharing economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 23-31.
    8. Wei, Wanying & Liu, Weihua & Tang, Ou & Dong, Chuanwen & Liang, Yanjie, 2023. "CSR investment for a two-sided platform: Network externality and risk aversion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 694-712.
    9. Hu, Xinru & Zhou, Shuiyin & Luo, Xiaomeng & Li, Jianbin & Zhang, Chi, 2024. "Optimal pricing strategy of an on-demand platform with cross-regional passengers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    10. Morvarid Rahmani & Luyi Gui & Atalay Atasu, 2021. "The Implications of Recycling Technology Choice on Extended Producer Responsibility," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(2), pages 522-542, February.
    11. Wang, Yulan & Wallace, Stein W. & Shen, Bin & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2015. "Service supply chain management: A review of operational models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 685-698.
    12. Bian, Yiwen & Cui, Yitong & Yan, Shuai & Han, Xiaohua, 2021. "Optimal strategy of a customer-to-customer sharing platform: Whether to launch its own sharing service?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    13. Sun, Xiaojie & Tang, Wansheng & Chen, Jing & Zhang, Jianxiong, 2020. "Optimal investment strategy of a free-floating sharing platform," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    14. Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2019. "Blockchain-technology-supported platforms for diamond authentication and certification in luxury supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 17-29.
    15. Zheng, Zhijun & Li, Gang & Cheng, T.C.E & Wu, Feng, 2022. "Offline supplementary service strategies for the online marketplace: Third-party service or marketplace service?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    16. Cui-Hua Zhang & Peng Xing & Jin Li, 2018. "Optimal Strategy of Social Responsibility and Quality Effort in Service Supply Chain with Quality Preference," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(03), pages 1-43, June.
    17. Chen, Junlin & Xiong, Jinghong & Chen, Guobao & Liu, Xin & Yan, Peng & Jiang, Hai, 2024. "Optimal instant discounts of multiple ride options at a ride-hailing aggregator," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 718-734.
    18. Yang, Jie & Zhao, Daozhi & Wang, Zeyu & Xu, Chunqiu, 2022. "Impact of regulation on on-demand ride-sharing service: Profit-based target vs demand-based target," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    19. Daozhi Zhao & Mingyang Chen, 2019. "Ex-ante versus ex-post destination information model for on-demand service ride-sharing platform," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 279(1), pages 301-341, August.
    20. Nils Boysen & Stefan Fedtke & Stefan Schwerdfeger, 2021. "Last-mile delivery concepts: a survey from an operational research perspective," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 1-58, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:181:y:2024:i:c:s136655452300354x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.