IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v183y2024ics0965856424001289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of urban waterlogging-induced road traffic safety risk and identification of its driving factors: A case study of Beijing

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Zihao
  • Wang, Hao
  • Chen, Bin

Abstract

Due to the increasing number of urban waterlogging events, systematic risk assessment and cause exploration are needed to ensure the safety of people's lives and property on roads. In this paper, the urban waterlogging-induced road traffic safety risk (UWRTSR) in the central part of Beijing was assessed and its driving factors were investigated. We obtained the simulation data of road inundation for five rainstorm return periods (5-year, 10-year, 20-year, 50-year and 100-year) through the InfoWorks ICM hydrodynamic model. Then, the safety risk levels of pedestrians and vehicles are evaluated with safety criteria formulas and standards, and the driving factors are identified by the Geodetector model. The results show that the proportion of the total length of road sections at different risk levels for pedestrians, stationary vehicles and moving vehicles increased with increasing rainstorm return period, while for the same road section, the risk level for pedestrians or vehicles may increase due to a higher intensity rainstorm event. The results of subsequent driving factor analysis show that slope, terrain ruggedness index (TRI) and LS factor were the top three single-factor explanatory powers, with the joint effect of slope and rain pipe capacity (RPC) possessing the largest explanatory power. It is found that a high level UWRTSR is to be generated in road sections with low drain network specifications and high slope gradients. Our research may help smooth emergency resource management, road network construction and reconstruction to mitigate the waterlogging risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Zihao & Wang, Hao & Chen, Bin, 2024. "Assessment of urban waterlogging-induced road traffic safety risk and identification of its driving factors: A case study of Beijing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:183:y:2024:i:c:s0965856424001289
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2024.104080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424001289
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2024.104080?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:183:y:2024:i:c:s0965856424001289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.