IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v183y2024ics0965856424000934.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cruising for parking again: Measuring the ground truth and using survival analysis to reveal the determinants of the duration

Author

Listed:
  • Saki, Siavash
  • Hagen, Tobias

Abstract

To effectively address the challenges posed by parking searches, accurate quantification is essential. This paper introduces a novel methodology to collect unbiased ground truth GPS data on parking search behaviors. Using a mobile application, we tracked the exact starting point, chosen parking spot, and final walking destination of over 3,000 trips in Germany from 2021 to 2023. Our findings indicate a mean parking search duration of 1.5 min (in large city centers 1 min and 53 s), a figure notably lower than previous survey-based estimates. This discrepancy suggests potential biases in traditional parking search surveys, possibly stemming from negativity bias. Our research employs a competing-risks survival analysis model to investigate factors affecting parking search duration simultaneously across different categories: Free, Paid, and Illegal parking. This enables the model to examine how the driver's choice between Free, Paid, and Illegal parking interacts with and influences the parking search duration. Furthermore, our duration dependency analysis, facilitated by a time-varying baseline hazard, reveals that prolonged search duration tends to make drivers more flexible toward less optimal parking options. This inclination is particularly evident for Paid parking, indicating that as the search duration extends, drivers increasingly consider Paid parking alternatives. Typically, drivers prioritize Free parking and opt for Paid options only after unsuccessful initial searches. This behavior underscores the notion that the coexistence of Free and Paid parking in urban areas might grow parking search traffic. Additionally, our data shows that approximately 5% of journeys end in Illegal parking. In these journeys, drivers often predetermine their choice of Illegal parking, as evidenced by the significantly shorter average search duration for these cases and the result that the likelihood of Illegal parking is not affected by the previous search duration.

Suggested Citation

  • Saki, Siavash & Hagen, Tobias, 2024. "Cruising for parking again: Measuring the ground truth and using survival analysis to reveal the determinants of the duration," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:183:y:2024:i:c:s0965856424000934
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2024.104045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424000934
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2024.104045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:183:y:2024:i:c:s0965856424000934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.