IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v42y2018i8p587-611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leadership with 5G in Europe: Two contrasting images of the future, with policy and regulatory implications

Author

Listed:
  • Lemstra, Wolter

Abstract

European policy makers have shown a keen interest in the success of 5G because ubiquitous and high capacity electronic communication infrastructure is recognized as a cornerstone of economic development and productivity growth. The second generation, GSM, is considered the leading example, reaching its peak of deployment in 2015 with 3.83 billion subscribers served by over 700 operators in 219 countries and territories.

Suggested Citation

  • Lemstra, Wolter, 2018. "Leadership with 5G in Europe: Two contrasting images of the future, with policy and regulatory implications," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(8), pages 587-611.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:42:y:2018:i:8:p:587-611
    DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2018.02.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596118300491
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.02.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lemstra, Wolter & Voogt, Bart & van Gorp, Nicolai, 2015. "Measuring broadband in Europe: Development of a market model and performance index using structural equations modelling," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 253-268.
    2. W. Lemstra & P. Anker & V. Hayes, 2011. "Cognitive Radio: Enabling Technology in Need of Coordination," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Intersentia, vol. 12(3), pages 210-236, September.
    3. Kano, Sadahiko, 2000. "Technical innovations, standardization and regional comparison -- a case study in mobile communications," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 305-321, May.
    4. Haug, Thomas, 0. "A commentary on standardization practices: lessons from the NMT and GSM mobile telephone standards histories," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3-4), pages 101-107, April.
    5. Lyytinen, Kalle & Fomin, Vladislav V., 0. "Achieving high momentum in the evolution of wireless infrastructures: the battle over the 1G solutions," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3-4), pages 149-170, April.
    6. van Damme, E.E.C., 2001. "The Dutch UMTS-auction in retrospect," Other publications TiSEM 68df5654-8af9-45b5-9950-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), 2011. "International Handbook of Network Industries," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12961.
    8. Shy,Oz, 2001. "The Economics of Network Industries," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521805001.
    9. Anker, Peter, 2017. "From spectrum management to spectrum governance," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 486-497.
    10. Lehenkari, Janne & Miettinen, Reijo, 0. "Standardisation in the construction of a large technological system--the case of the Nordic mobile telephone system," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3-4), pages 109-127, April.
    11. William H. Melody & Wolter Lemstra, 2011. "Liberalization in Radio Spectrum Management," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Gandal, Neil & Salant, David & Waverman, Leonard, 0. "Standards in wireless telephone networks," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(5-6), pages 325-332, June.
    13. Higham, Nicholas, 1994. "Mobile and personal communications : The European commission's green paper," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(9), pages 705-714, December.
    14. Gruber,Harald, 2005. "The Economics of Mobile Telecommunications," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521843270, November.
    15. Willia H Melody, 2011. "Liberalization in the Telecom Sector," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Gwanhoo, 2019. "What roles should the government play in fostering the advancement of the internet of things?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 434-444.
    2. Mansell, Robin, 2021. "Adjusting to the digital: societal outcomes and consequences," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 111571, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Nyström, Anna-Greta & Gugenishvili, Ilia, 2019. "Business opportunities in 5G mobile technology," 30th European Regional ITS Conference, Helsinki 2019 205202, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    4. Mendonça, Sandro & Damásio, Bruno & Charlita de Freitas, Luciano & Oliveira, Luís & Cichy, Marcin & Nicita, António, 2022. "The rise of 5G technologies and systems: A quantitative analysis of knowledge production," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(4).
    5. Massaro, Maria & Kim, Seongcheol, 2022. "Why is South Korea at the forefront of 5G? Insights from technology systems theory," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5).
    6. Lee, Chuan-Kai & Yu, Limeng, 2022. "A multi-level perspective on 5G transition: The China case," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    7. Rossi, Maria Alessandra, 2022. "The advent of 5G and the non-discrimination principle," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(4).
    8. Edward J. Oughton & Ashutosh Jha, 2021. "Supportive 5G Infrastructure Policies are Essential for Universal 6G: Assessment using an Open-source Techno-economic Simulation Model utilizing Remote Sensing," Papers 2102.08086, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2021.
    9. Gruber, Harald, 2019. "Proposals for a digital industrial policy for Europe," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 116-127.
    10. Jeon, Chunmi & Han, Seung Hun & Kim, Hyeong Joon & Kim, Sangsoo, 2022. "The effect of government 5G policies on telecommunication operators’ firm value: Evidence from China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2).
    11. Vuojala, Heli & Mustonen, Miia & Chen, Xianfu & Kujanpää, Kaisa & Ruuska, Pekka & Höyhtyä, Marko & Matinmikko-Blue, Marja & Kalliovaara, Juha & Talmola, Pekka & Nyström, Anna-Greta, 2020. "Spectrum access options for vertical network service providers in 5G," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(4).
    12. Cave, Martin, 2018. "How disruptive is 5G?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(8), pages 653-658.
    13. Mansell, Robin, 2021. "Adjusting to the digital: Societal outcomes and consequences," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    14. Bauer, Johannes M. & Bohlin, Erik, 2022. "Regulation and innovation in 5G markets," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(4).
    15. Forge, Simon & Vu, Khuong, 2020. "Forming a 5G strategy for developing countries: A note for policy makers," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7).
    16. Ahokangas, Petri & Matinmikko-Blue, Marja & Yrjölä, Seppo & Hämmäinen, Heikki, 2021. "Platform configurations for local and private 5G networks in complex industrial multi-stakeholder ecosystems," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(5).
    17. Maxwell Olokundun & Mercy Ejovwokeoghene Ogbari & Hezekiah Falola & Ayodotun Stephen Ibidunni, 2022. "Leveraging 5G network for digital innovation in small and medium enterprises: a conceptual review," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicoletta Corrocher & Lorenzo Zirulia, 2010. "Switching costs, consumer heterogeneity and price discrimination," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 101(2), pages 149-167, October.
    2. Shim, Yongwoon & Lee, Heejin & Fomin, Vladislav, 2019. "What benefits couldn't ‘Joyn’ enjoy?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 125-134.
    3. Gupta, Ruchita & Jain, Karuna, 2016. "Competition effect of a new mobile technology on an incumbent technology: An Indian case study," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 332-342.
    4. Joshua S. Gans & Stephen P. King & Julian Wright, 2005. "Wireless Communications," Monash Economics Working Papers archive-45, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    5. Peter ANKER & Wolter LEMSTRA, 2013. "Cognitive Radio: How to Proceed? An Actor-Centric Approach," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(90), pages 77-95, 2nd quart.
    6. Massaro, Maria & Pogorel, Gérard, 2015. "Next generation of radio spectrum management licensed shared access and the trade-off between static and dynamic efficiency," 2015 Regional ITS Conference, Los Angeles 2015 146322, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    7. Massaro, Maria & Pogorel, Gérard & Bohlin, Erik, 2015. "Next Generation of Radio Spectrum Management: Licensed Shared Access and the trade-off between Static and Dynamic Efficiency," 26th European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2015 127164, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    8. Muck, Johannes & Heimeshoff, Ulrich, 2012. "First mover advantages in mobile telecommunications: Evidence from OECD countries," DICE Discussion Papers 71, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    9. Erik Bohlin & Gary Madden & Aaron Morey, 2010. "An Econometric Analysis of 3G Auction Spectrum Valuations," RSCAS Working Papers 2010/55, European University Institute.
    10. Massaro, Maria, 2017. "Next generation of radio spectrum management: Licensed shared access for 5G," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 422-433.
    11. G. Kaa & M. J. Greeven, 2017. "Mobile telecommunication standardization in Japan, China, the United States, and Europe: a comparison of regulatory and industrial regimes," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 181-192, May.
    12. Carole RENTSCH & Matthias FINGER, 2014. "Yes, no, maybe: the ambiguous relationships between State-owned enterprises and States," Departmental Working Papers 2014-05, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    13. Davide Consoli & Pier Paolo Patrucco, 2011. "Complexity and the Coordination of Technological Knowledge: The Case of Innovation Platforms," Chapters, in: Handbook on the Economic Complexity of Technological Change, chapter 8 Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Christian Dahl Winther, 2007. "Optimal research effort and product differentiation in network industries," Economics Working Papers 2007-19, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    15. Hahn, Robert & Evans, Lewis, 2010. "Regulating Dynamic Markets: Progress in Theory and Practice," Working Paper Series 4052, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    16. Jean Gabszewicz & Victor Ginsburgh & Shlomo Weber, 2011. "Bilingualism and Communicative Benefits," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 101-102, pages 271-286.
    17. Victor Ginsburgh & Jacques Melitz & Farid Toubal, 2014. "Foreign Language Learning : An Econometric Analysis," Working Papers 2014-21, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    18. Trillas, Francesc, 2010. "Electricity and telecoms reforms in the EU: Insights from the economics of federalism," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 66-76, June.
    19. Heggedal, Tom-Reiel & Helland, Leif & Neset Joslin, Knut-Eric, 2018. "Should I Stay or should I Go? Bandwagons in the lab," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 86-97.
    20. Xie, Zongjie & Hall, Jeremy & McCarthy, Ian P. & Skitmore, Martin & Shen, Liyin, 2016. "Standardization efforts: The relationship between knowledge dimensions, search processes and innovation outcomes," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 48, pages 69-78.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:42:y:2018:i:8:p:587-611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.