IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v203y2024ics0040162524001288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can digital literacy improve individuals' incomes and narrow the income gap?

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Zhongwei
  • Cui, Ruijie
  • Tang, Can
  • Wang, Zihan

Abstract

This paper constructs an evaluation index system of digital literacy based on the data from China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) in 2018 from five dimensions: information and learning, vocational abilities, digital sociability, digital content creation, and digital security, and empirically tests the impact of digital literacy on individuals' income level and income gap. Firstly, The results show that digital literacy can significantly improve the overall individual's income level and narrow the internal individual income gap. Digital literacy is conducive to narrowing the income gap between the sexes but has an insignificant impact on the intergenerational and urban-rural income gap. In addition, digital literacy in paternal and urban samples is more conducive to narrowing the internal income gap among women, offspring, and rural samples than males. The corresponding use of digital skills and productive digital literacy have a greater impact on narrowing residents' internal income gap than the penetration of digital awareness and living digital literacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Zhongwei & Cui, Ruijie & Tang, Can & Wang, Zihan, 2024. "Can digital literacy improve individuals' incomes and narrow the income gap?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:203:y:2024:i:c:s0040162524001288
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524001288
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123332?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:203:y:2024:i:c:s0040162524001288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.