IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v210y2024ics0167715224000993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Posterior robustness with milder conditions: Contamination models revisited

Author

Listed:
  • Hamura, Yasuyuki
  • Irie, Kaoru
  • Sugasawa, Shonosuke

Abstract

Robust Bayesian linear regression is a classical but essential statistical tool. Although novel robustness properties of posterior distributions have been proved recently under a certain class of error distributions, their sufficient conditions are restrictive and exclude several important situations. In this work, we revisit a classical two-component mixture model for response variables, also known as contamination model, where one component is a light-tailed regression model and the other component is heavy-tailed. The latter component is independent of the regression parameters, which is crucial in proving the posterior robustness. We obtain new sufficient conditions for posterior (non-)robustness and reveal non-trivial robustness results by using those conditions. In particular, we find that even the Student-t error distribution can achieve the posterior robustness in our framework. A numerical study is performed to check the Kullback–Leibler divergence between the posterior distribution based on full data and that based on data obtained by removing outliers.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamura, Yasuyuki & Irie, Kaoru & Sugasawa, Shonosuke, 2024. "Posterior robustness with milder conditions: Contamination models revisited," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:210:y:2024:i:c:s0167715224000993
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2024.110130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715224000993
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2024.110130?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:210:y:2024:i:c:s0167715224000993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.