IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v348y2024ics0277953624002491.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sense of failure in end of life care: Perspectives from physicians and nurses

Author

Listed:
  • Stokar, Yaffa Naomi

Abstract

Limited knowledge exists regarding sensed failure resulting provision of end-of-life (EOL) care. Among medical health professionals (MHP), a sense of failure is associated with impaired patientcare and reduced worker wellbeing, including higher rates of burnout and secondary traumatic stress. As part of a larger mixed-methods study on the effects of EOL-care provision on MHP in general hospitals, semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 22 physicians and nurses at three tertiary Israeli hospitals, representing a wide range of medical specialties, training, experience, and cultural backgrounds. Qualitative thematic analysis of the interviews led to the identification of the theme ‘sense of failure’ with the sub-themes ‘sources’ and ‘lived meanings’ of the sensed failure. Apart from the source ‘losing a patient’ all other identified sources were recognized as work-related risk factors, including ‘unsupportive environments’ and ‘shortcomings of the medical practice.’ Two of the lived meaning ‘sense of personal responsibility’ and ‘moral injury’ were also recognized as work-related risk factors. Surprisingly, albeit the adverse context of EOL-care, the two remaining lived meanings ‘learning from failure’ and ‘sense of purpose’ were recognized as protective resilience factors. Changes in workplace norms by focusing on leadership and mentoring programs and implementation of evidence based interventions aimed at reducing the sense of failure and enhancing feelings of purpose are recommended. Finally, the findings described in the study would benefit from continued studies on larger scales.

Suggested Citation

  • Stokar, Yaffa Naomi, 2024. "Sense of failure in end of life care: Perspectives from physicians and nurses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:348:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624002491
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624002491
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116805?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:348:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624002491. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.