IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v92y2024icp796-818.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust and inter-regional M&As: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Zhenshan
  • Xu, Huilin

Abstract

This paper investigates the economic impact of trust on inter-region mergers and acquisitions (M&As) using a large sample of M&As in China. We find that trust distance among regions negatively predicts frequency of inter-region mergers, merger volume and synergy gains. Economic mechanism analysis shows that trust distance lowers merger gains through imposing transaction cost on the deal. The negative effects of trust distance on inter-region M&As activities and synergy gains are less pronounced when legal institution level distance between regions are smaller, consistent with trust being a substitute for formal institutions; it is less prominent when corporate governance and information disclosure level distance between regions are smaller, suggesting that trust is more important in transactions with higher information asymmetry; it is less salient when financial market development level distances between regions are smaller, consistent with trust is less important with repeated interactions between economic parties. Overall, our results highlight the role trust plays in shaping corporate decisions and economic outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Zhenshan & Xu, Huilin, 2024. "Trust and inter-regional M&As: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 796-818.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:92:y:2024:i:c:p:796-818
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2024.02.028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024001023
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2024.02.028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:92:y:2024:i:c:p:796-818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.