IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v193y2024ics1364032124000194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global, regional, and local acceptance of solar power

Author

Listed:
  • Nuortimo, Kalle
  • Harkonen, Janne
  • Breznik, Kristijan

Abstract

This study aims to analyse solar power acceptance by different methods in various knowledge domains to gain a holistic view of global, regional, and local acceptance. This includes considering different related aspects of solar energy, including the overall concept, solar panel, the device converting sunlight into electricity, and photovoltaics, the technology. This multidisciplinary approach is possible through the advancement of artificial intelligence technology. Technology acceptance and sentiment, the emotion, are different concepts with slightly different influences on technology deployment. Acceptance can be granted as a social license and can be affected by how the media discusses the technologies. The acceptance further influences investment decisions and wider technology adoption. Sentiment can be obtained by machine or human-made analysis, in which the polarity (positive, negative, or neutral) is defined while the acceptance levels are indicative. This study applies opinion mining, chat generative pre-trained transformer, and generalised aggregated lexical tables methods to analyse the acceptance and sentiment of solar power at different levels. The findings and the original contribution involve highlighting the potential of artificial intelligence to study general acceptance. Artificial intelligence appears capable of providing a fast indication of both media sentiment and the level of acceptance of solar power. Traditional opinion mining seems to be more capable of acknowledging trends. This supports understanding the market environment and factors affecting technology development and deployment. Decision-making can benefit from a fast indication.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuortimo, Kalle & Harkonen, Janne & Breznik, Kristijan, 2024. "Global, regional, and local acceptance of solar power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:193:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124000194
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.114296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124000194
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114296?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adrian Rauchfleisch & Jo-Ju Kao & Tzu-Hsuan Tseng & Chia-Tzu Ho & Lu-Yi Li, 2023. "Maximizing Science Outreach on Facebook: An Analysis of Scientists’ Communication Strategies in Taiwan," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 228-239.
    2. Devine-Wright, Patrick & Wiersma, Bouke, 2020. "Understanding community acceptance of a potential offshore wind energy project in different locations: An island-based analysis of ‘place-technology fit’," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    3. Shakeel, Shah Rukh & Takala, Josu & Zhu, Lian-Dong, 2017. "Commercialization of renewable energy technologies: A ladder building approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 855-867.
    4. Jacobsson, Staffan & Lauber, Volkmar, 2006. "The politics and policy of energy system transformation--explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 256-276, February.
    5. Agnieszka Izabela Baruk & Sebastian Białoskurski, 2020. "The effect of innovative food products on shaping the image of their offerors," American Journal of Business, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(1), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Kardooni, Roozbeh & Yusoff, Sumiani Binti & Kari, Fatimah Binti, 2016. "Renewable energy technology acceptance in Peninsular Malaysia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1-10.
    7. Elsa Hedling, 2020. "Storytelling in EU public diplomacy: reputation management and recognition of success," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(2), pages 143-152, June.
    8. Majidi Nezhad, Meysam & Heydari, Azim & Neshat, Mehdi & Keynia, Farshid & Piras, Giuseppe & Garcia, Davide Astiaso, 2022. "A Mediterranean Sea Offshore Wind classification using MERRA-2 and machine learning models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 156-166.
    9. Anthony Leiserowitz, 2007. "International Public Opinion, Perception, and Understanding of Global Climate Change," Human Development Occasional Papers (1992-2007) HDOCPA-2007-31, Human Development Report Office (HDRO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
    10. Saqib Ali & Petra Poulova & Ahsan Akbar & Hafiz Muhammad Usama Javed & Muhammad Danish, 2020. "Determining the Influencing Factors in the Adoption of Solar Photovoltaic Technology in Pakistan: A Decomposed Technology Acceptance Model Approach," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-20, December.
    11. Alessandro Muscio & Felice Simonelli & Hien Vu, 2023. "Bridging the valley of death in the EU renewable energy sector: Toward a new energy policy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4620-4635, November.
    12. Serena Y. Kim & Koushik Ganesan & Princess Dickens & Soumya Panda, 2021. "Public Sentiment toward Solar Energy—Opinion Mining of Twitter Using a Transformer-Based Language Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Nuortimo, Kalle & Härkönen, Janne, 2018. "Opinion mining approach to study media-image of energy production. Implications to public acceptance and market deployment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 210-217.
    14. Nuortimo, Kalle & Härkönen, Janne & Karvonen, Erkki, 2018. "Exploring the global media image of solar power," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2806-2811.
    15. Eva A. M. van Dis & Johan Bollen & Willem Zuidema & Robert van Rooij & Claudi L. Bockting, 2023. "ChatGPT: five priorities for research," Nature, Nature, vol. 614(7947), pages 224-226, February.
    16. Benjamin K. Sovacool & Raphael J. Heffron & Darren McCauley & Andreas Goldthau, 2016. "Energy decisions reframed as justice and ethical concerns," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 1(5), pages 1-6, May.
    17. Abdar, Moloud & Basiri, Mohammad Ehsan & Yin, Junjun & Habibnezhad, Mahmoud & Chi, Guangqing & Nemati, Shahla & Asadi, Somayeh, 2020. "Energy choices in Alaska: Mining people's perception and attitudes from geotagged tweets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    18. Kalle Nuortimo & Janne Harkonen, 2019. "Improving strategic decision making with big data-based media analysis - the case of coal power," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(3), pages 187-208.
    19. Burghard, Uta & Dütschke, Elisabeth & Caldes, Natalia & Oltra, Christian, 2022. "Cross-border concentrated solar power projects - opportunity or dead end? A study into actor views in Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    20. Vonny Susanti & Andreas Samudro, 2022. "Assessing the Role of Corporate Reputation on Brand Satisfaction: A Study of Chemical Industry," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(2), pages 122-138, May.
    21. Caferra, Rocco & D'Adamo, Idiano & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2023. "Wasting energy or energizing waste? The public acceptance of waste-to-energy technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    22. Yang Liu & Taru Nousiainen & Shpend Imeri, 2015. "Design as a source of international competitive advantage for SMOPEC firms," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(3), pages 277-298.
    23. van den Berg, Kimo & Tempels, Barbara, 2022. "The role of community benefits in community acceptance of multifunctional solar farms in the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arifa Tanveer & Shihong Zeng & Muhammad Irfan & Rui Peng, 2021. "Do Perceived Risk, Perception of Self-Efficacy, and Openness to Technology Matter for Solar PV Adoption? An Application of the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Anna Codemo & Ambra Barbini & Ahi Mantouza & Anastasios Bitziadis & Rossano Albatici, 2023. "Integration of Public Perception in the Assessment of Licensed Solar Farms: A Case Study in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-25, June.
    3. Abdar, Moloud & Basiri, Mohammad Ehsan & Yin, Junjun & Habibnezhad, Mahmoud & Chi, Guangqing & Nemati, Shahla & Asadi, Somayeh, 2020. "Energy choices in Alaska: Mining people's perception and attitudes from geotagged tweets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    4. Alina Ștefania Chenic & Alin Ioan Cretu & Adrian Burlacu & Nicolae Moroianu & Daniela Vîrjan & Dragos Huru & Mihaela Roberta Stanef-Puica & Vladimir Enachescu, 2022. "Logical Analysis on the Strategy for a Sustainable Transition of the World to Green Energy—2050. Smart Cities and Villages Coupled to Renewable Energy Sources with Low Carbon Footprint," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-30, July.
    5. Zeng, Shihong & Tanveer, Arifa & Fu, Xiaolan & Gu, Yuxiao & Irfan, Muhammad, 2022. "Modeling the influence of critical factors on the adoption of green energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    6. Park, Seona & Yun, Sun-Jin & Cho, Kongjang, 2024. "Energy justice: Lessons from offshore wind farm siting conflicts in South Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    7. Marcel Bednarz & Tom Broekel, 2020. "Pulled or pushed? The spatial diffusion of wind energy between local demand and supply," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(4), pages 893-916.
    8. Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L. & Arabatzis, Garyfallos & Tsialis, Panagiotis & Ioannou, Konstantinos, 2018. "Electricity consumption and RES plants in Greece: Typologies of regional units," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 134-144.
    9. Nathalie Spittler & Ganna Gladkykh & Arnaud Diemer & Brynhildur Davidsdottir, 2019. "Understanding the Current Energy Paradigm and Energy System Models for More Sustainable Energy System Development," Post-Print hal-02127724, HAL.
    10. Hogan, Jessica L. & Warren, Charles R. & Simpson, Michael & McCauley, Darren, 2022. "What makes local energy projects acceptable? Probing the connection between ownership structures and community acceptance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    11. Wan, Qilong & Qian, Jine & Baghirli, Araz & Aghayev, Aligul, 2022. "Green finance and carbon reduction: Implications for green recovery," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 901-913.
    12. Tan, R.R. & Aviso, K.B. & Ng, D.K.S., 2019. "Optimization models for financing innovations in green energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    13. Neij, Lena & Heiskanen, Eva & Strupeit, Lars, 2017. "The deployment of new energy technologies and the need for local learning," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 274-283.
    14. Harborne, Paul & Hendry, Chris, 2009. "Pathways to commercial wind power in the US, Europe and Japan: The role of demonstration projects and field trials in the innovation process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 3580-3595, September.
    15. Geels, Frank W. & Kern, Florian & Fuchs, Gerhard & Hinderer, Nele & Kungl, Gregor & Mylan, Josephine & Neukirch, Mario & Wassermann, Sandra, 2016. "The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014)," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 896-913.
    16. Eleftheriadis, Iordanis M. & Anagnostopoulou, Evgenia G., 2015. "Identifying barriers in the diffusion of renewable energy sources," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 153-164.
    17. Evangelos Katsamakas & Oleg V. Pavlov & Ryan Saklad, 2024. "Artificial intelligence and the transformation of higher education institutions," Papers 2402.08143, arXiv.org.
    18. Frank, Alejandro Germán & Gerstlberger, Wolfgang & Paslauski, Carolline Amaral & Lerman, Laura Visintainer & Ayala, Néstor Fabián, 2018. "The contribution of innovation policy criteria to the development of local renewable energy systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 353-365.
    19. Xin Su & Frédéric Ghersi & Fei Teng & Gaëlle Le Treut & Meicong Liang, 2022. "The economic impact of a deep decarbonisation pathway for China: a hybrid model analysis through bottom-up and top-down linking," Post-Print hal-03897206, HAL.
    20. Muhammad Haseeb & Irwan Shah Zainal Abidin & Qazi Muhammad Adnan Hye & Nira Hariyatie Hartani, 2019. "The Impact of Renewable Energy on Economic Well-Being of Malaysia: Fresh Evidence from Auto Regressive Distributed Lag Bound Testing Approach," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(1), pages 269-275.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:193:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124000194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.