IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v271y2024ics0925527324000549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of consumers’ anticipated regret on brand owners’ blockchain adoption in the presence of a secondhand market

Author

Listed:
  • Guan, Zhimin
  • Yu, Tianyang
  • Dong, Jingyang
  • Zhang, Jun

Abstract

Blockchain has been widely adopted in the field of product traceability owing to its powerful information tracing function. In this study, considering consumers’ anticipated regret (e.g., high-price regret and misfit regret), we investigate a brand owner’s (BO’s) blockchain adoption strategy under competition between new and secondhand products. Moreover, we identify the uncertainty mitigation effect and brand image improvement effect of blockchain adoption. Four scenarios are involved: Scenario NN (without blockchain and no anticipated regret), Scenario NH (without blockchain considering only high-price regret), Scenario NL (without blockchain considering only misfit regret), and Scenario B (with blockchain). We construct Stackelberg games to explore the optimal pricing decisions for BO and secondhand supplier (SS). The results indicate that, without blockchain adoption, alleviating high-price regret (or stimulating misfit regret) can enhance the profits of both BO and SS. BO does not necessarily benefit from blockchain adoption. Specifically, blockchain adoption increases BO’s profits if (1) the brand image improvement level is large, or (2) the brand image improvement level is moderate, and the high-price regret intensity is strong (or the misfit regret intensity is weak). Furthermore, under certain conditions, SS is able to become a free rider of BO’s blockchain adoption. Three extensions are analyzed to demonstrate that key findings are robust.

Suggested Citation

  • Guan, Zhimin & Yu, Tianyang & Dong, Jingyang & Zhang, Jun, 2024. "Impact of consumers’ anticipated regret on brand owners’ blockchain adoption in the presence of a secondhand market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:271:y:2024:i:c:s0925527324000549
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527324000549
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109197?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:271:y:2024:i:c:s0925527324000549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.