IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v138y2024ics0264837723004933.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land use policy impacts on effective farmland planting area: A case study in Heilongjiang Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yu, Shengnan
  • Qi, Jiaguo
  • Zhang, Xiaokang
  • Pueppke, Steven G.
  • Ou, Weixin
  • Liu, Huanjun
  • Cai, Xiumin
  • Ren, Tingting

Abstract

Farmland use policy in China has evolved substantially over the past 70 years, undergoing five stages from communal (1950 s-1980 s) to household-based (1980 s-1990 s), land circulation (1990 s-2000 s), family farms (2000 s-2010 s), and then cooperative systems (2010 s-present). Among many benefits and consequences that have been explored in previous studies, an overlooked impact is the effective farmland planting area (EFPA), resulting from farmland fragmentation at different stages. We used remotely sensed imagery to quantify farmland fragmentation and EFPA in a representative agricultural area in northeast China. Specifically, we used the K-means (WKKM) and the regression decision trees (CART) classification methods to extract patch size of planted areas and crop planted information in the Google Earth Engine (GEE) environment, and compared the results with field measurements to assess the classification accuracy, and calculated the EFPA. The results showed that the total number of patches increased rapidly after the dissolution of the communal system but declined until the cooperative policy was implemented. The EFPA was negatively related to the number of patches, with an average of 90% EFPA during the commune period, ∼70% in the household responsibility period and ∼86% during the cooperative period. In conclusion, land use policy played a key role in balancing the EFPA and farmers’ incentives and thus affected the EFPA in northeast China.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu, Shengnan & Qi, Jiaguo & Zhang, Xiaokang & Pueppke, Steven G. & Ou, Weixin & Liu, Huanjun & Cai, Xiumin & Ren, Tingting, 2024. "Land use policy impacts on effective farmland planting area: A case study in Heilongjiang Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:138:y:2024:i:c:s0264837723004933
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.107027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723004933
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.107027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Jing & Jin, Xiaobin & Xu, Weiyi & Sun, Rui & Han, Bo & Yang, Xuhong & Gu, Zhengming & Xu, Cuilan & Sui, Xueyan & Zhou, Yinkang, 2019. "Influential factors and classification of cultivated land fragmentation, and implications for future land consolidation: A case study of Jiangsu Province in eastern China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Lin LIANG & Shanlang LIN & Zuoxiong ZHANG, 2015. "Effect of the family life cycle on the family farm scale in Southern China," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(9), pages 429-440.
    3. Gianni Guastella & Stefano Pareglio, 2014. "Urban Systems, Urbanization Dynamics And Land Use In Italy: Evidence From A Spatial Analysis," DISCE - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali dises1400, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xie, Jinhua & Yang, Gangqiao & Wang, Ge & Song, Yan & Yang, Fan, 2021. "How do different rural-land-consolidation modes shape farmers’ ecological production behaviors?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Hong, Huikun & Cai, Zhicong & Liao, Heping & Liu, Ting, 2024. "Rural housing-jobs synergy at the county level in mountainous and hilly areas of China: Spatio-temporal pattern and driving mechanism," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    3. Yifang Wang & Linlin Cheng & Yang Zheng, 2023. "An Adjusted Landscape Ecological Security of Cultivated Land Evaluation Method Based on the Interaction between Cultivated Land and Surrounding Land Types," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Ar. R. T. Hidayat & Corinthias P. M. Sianipar & Shizuka Hashimoto & Satoshi Hoshino & Muhammad Dimyati & Ahmad E. Yustika, 2023. "Personal Cognition and Implicit Constructs Affecting Preferential Decisions on Farmland Ownership: Multiple Case Studies in Kediri, East Java, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Xiaoyu Chen & Qingming Zhan & Yuli Fan, 2023. "Classification and Evaluation Methods for Optimization of Land Use Efficiency at Village Level," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Eugenio Cejudo-García & Francisco Navarro-Valverde & José Antonio Cañete-Pérez, 2022. "Who Decides and Who Invests? The Role of the Public, Private and Third Sectors in Rural Development according to Geographical Contexts: The LEADER Approach in Andalusia, 2007–2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Dongjie Wang & Hao Yang & Yueming Hu & A-Xing Zhu & Xiaoyun Mao, 2022. "Analyzing Spatio-Temporal Characteristics of Cultivated Land Fragmentation and Their Influencing Factors in a Rapidly Developing Region: A Case Study in Guangdong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Yuanyuan Chen & Mu Li & Zemin Zhang, 2023. "Does the Rural Land Transfer Promote the Non-Grain Production of Cultivated Land in China?," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Yan, Jinming & Zhang, Dongsheng & Xia, Fangzhou, 2021. "Evaluation of village land use planning risks in green concepts: The case of Qiwangfen Village in Beijing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    10. Xu, Weiyi & Jin, Xiaobin & Liu, Jing & Zhou, Yinkang, 2021. "Analysis of influencing factors of cultivated land fragmentation based on hierarchical linear model: A case study of Jiangsu Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    11. Jie Zhang & Meiqiu Chen & Chang Huang & Zhaohao Lai, 2022. "Labor Endowment, Cultivated Land Fragmentation, and Ecological Farming Adoption Strategies among Farmers in Jiangxi Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, May.
    12. Zhi Wang & Fengwan Zhang & Shaoquan Liu & Dingde Xu, 2023. "Land Use Structure Optimization and Ecological Benefit Evaluation in Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration Based on Carbon Neutrality," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, May.
    13. Jie Qiao & Mike Crang & Liangping Hong & Xiaofeng Li, 2021. "Exploring the Benefits of Small Catchments on Rural Spatial Governance in Wuling Mountain Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    14. Yan Sun & Xiaojun Song & Jing Ma & Haochen Yu & Xiaoping Ge & Gang-Jun Liu & Fu Chen, 2021. "Assessing the Effectiveness for Achieving Policy Objectives of Land Consolidation in China: Evidence from Project Practices in Jiangsu Province from 2001 to 2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Jian Zhou & Chao Li & Xiaotong Chu & Chenying Luo, 2022. "Is Cultivated Land Increased by Land Consolidation Sustainably Used in Mountainous Areas?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Qian Sun & Mingjie Wu & Peiyu Du & Wei Qi & Xinyang Yu, 2022. "Spatial Layout Optimization and Simulation of Cultivated Land Based on the Life Community Theory in a Mountainous and Hilly Area of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    17. Han, Bo & Jin, Xiaobin & Sun, Rui & Li, Hanbing & Liang, Xinyuan & Zhou, Yinkang, 2023. "Understanding land-use sustainability with a systematical framework: An evaluation case of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    18. Zhou, Jian & Cao, Xiaoshu, 2020. "What is the policy improvement of China’s land consolidation? Evidence from completed land consolidation projects in Shaanxi Province," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    19. Yuanzhi Guo & Jieyong Wang, 2023. "Land Consolidation in Rural China: Historical Stages, Typical Modes, and Improvement Paths," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    20. Katarzyna Kocur-Bera & Jacek Rapiński & Monika Siejka & Przemysław Leń & Anna Małek, 2023. "Potential of an Area in Terms of Pro-Climate Solutions in a Land Consolidation Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-25, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:138:y:2024:i:c:s0264837723004933. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.