IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v135y2023ics026483772300412x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Values and representations in land registers and their legal, technical, social effects on land rights as an administrative artefact

Author

Listed:
  • Sommer, Felicitas
  • de Vries, Walter Timo

Abstract

Improvements in land administration tend to focus on initiating or completing titling efforts. Yet, finding and monitoring inequality and intransparency of land ownership and of land tenure is equally problematic. The central question is how land registration epitomizes and monitors the distribution of land rights, and if the administrative choices reinforce or hinder the insights into these aspects. The article reasons from a theoretical basis that land rights are socio-technical products of administrative procedures with inscribed concepts and visions of (desirable) farm structures. The analysis relies on an analysis of five specific cases of techno-administrative structures: land registration in combination with cadastres and trade registers; the administrative system of compensation after German unification; the management system controlling land transfers; the system of collecting agrarian statistics; the system of land market statistics. All represent sociotechnical constructs related to current authentic and public information repositories related to land, land rights and statistical data about land. All systems exhibit a very narrow thematic focus and extreme rigidity of system design and design choices. The construction and use of the systems depend on two historically persistent assumptions and narratives: land prices will always increase, and land is held by individual small farm holders. Both these visions and the systematic land information infrastructures conceal certain objects and dynamics, such as existing complex land ownership constellations and land use practices. Secondly, the data collection choices do not align with what land related policies require. Agricultural statistics are example following individual land ownership structures and ignoring private agglomerate ownership structures and dependencies. Consequently, the design of techno-administrative structures related to land lead to insufficient insights of land distribution and equality of land rights. The conclusion is therefore that the land related knowledge and information infrastructures need to be much more aligned with policy interventions and problem-oriented policy making. Currently they act as information silos and rely on outdated visions and assumptions. This requires however new models of land information organisation and governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Sommer, Felicitas & de Vries, Walter Timo, 2023. "Values and representations in land registers and their legal, technical, social effects on land rights as an administrative artefact," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:135:y:2023:i:c:s026483772300412x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106946
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772300412X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106946?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. Z. Bi & J. Y. Ma & J. Yan & X. Fang & D. Z. Yao & B. R. Zhao & X. G. Qiu, 2006. "Far-infrared optical properties of YVO 4 single crystal," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 51(2), pages 167-171, May.
    2. Forstner, Bernhard (Ed.) & Zavyalova, Ekaterina (Ed.), 2017. "Betriebs- und Unternehmensstrukturen in der deutschen Landwirtschaft: Workshop zu vorläufigen Ergebnissen und methodischen Ansätzen," Thünen Working Papers 80, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    3. Klare, Klaus & Doll, Helmut & Roggendorf, Wolfgang, 2001. "Potentielle Auswirkungen von Bodenfonds als Kapitalanlage auf landwirtschaftliche Betriebe," Arbeitsberichte aus der vTI-Agrarökonomie 06/2001, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    4. Tietz, Andreas, 2017. "Überregional aktive Kapitaleigentümer in ostdeutschen Agrarunternehmen: Entwicklungen bis 2017," Thünen Report 265014, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    5. Tietz, Andreas, 2017. "Überregional aktive Kapitaleigentümer in ostdeutschen Agrarunternehmen: Entwicklungen bis 2017," Thünen Reports 52, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    6. Walter Timo de Vries, 2022. "Social Aspects in Land Consolidation Processes," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.
    7. Forstner, Bernd & Zavyalova, Ekaterina, 2017. "Betriebs- und Unternehmensstrukturen in der deutschen Landwirtschaft: Workshop zu vorläufigen Ergebnissen und methodischen Ansätzen," Thünen Working Paper 267948, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bunkus, Ramona & Theesfeld, Insa, 2018. "Land Grabbing In Europe?," 58th Annual Conference, Kiel, Germany, September 12-14, 2018 275859, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    2. Back, Hans & Lehn , Friederike & Bahrs, Enno, 2018. "Der Einfluss Von Flächenkonzentration Und -Disparität Auf Die Bodenrichtwerte Von Ackerflächen – Thüringen, Rheinland-Pfalz Und Nordrhein-Westfalen Im Vergleich," 58th Annual Conference, Kiel, Germany, September 12-14, 2018 275847, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    3. Till Kuhn, David Schäfer, 2018. "A farm typology for North Rhine-Westphalia to assess agri-environmental policies," Discussion Papers 279702, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.
    4. Theesfeld, Insa & Soliev, Ilkhom & Bunkus, Ramona, 2020. "Social Dimensions of Agricultural Land Transactions in Germany: An Analysis with a Structural Equation Model," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305582, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    5. Ramona Bunkus & Insa Theesfeld, 2018. "Land Grabbing in Europe? Socio-Cultural Externalities of Large-Scale Land Acquisitions in East Germany," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Laschewski, Lutz & Tietz, Andreas, 2020. "Identität und Stabilität von Mehrfamilienunternehmen," 60th Annual Conference, Halle/ Saale, Germany, September 23-25, 2020 305599, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    7. Nowack, Wiebke & Schmid, Julia Christiane & Grethe, Harald, 2018. "Agrarstruktur Und Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik – Eine Analyse Der Deutschen Debatte Anhand," 58th Annual Conference, Kiel, Germany, September 12-14, 2018 275861, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    8. Duden, C. & Offermann, F., 2019. "Farmers' risk exposition and its drivers," 171st Seminar, September 5-6, 2019, Zürich, Switzerland 333722, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Rahmann, Gerold (Ed.) & Andres, C. (Ed.) & Yadav, A. K. (Ed.) & Ardakani, R. (Ed.) & Babalad, H. B. (Ed.) & Devakumar, N. (Ed.) & Goel, S. L. (Ed.) & Olowe, V. (Ed.) & Ravisankar, N. (Ed.) & Saini, J., 2017. "Innovative research for organic 3.0 - Volume 2: Proceedings of the scientific track at the Organic World Congress 2017, November 9-11 in Delhi, India," Thünen Reports 54,2, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    10. Leonhardt, Heidi & Penker, Marianne & Salhofer, Klaus, 2019. "Do farmers care about rented land? A multi-method study on land tenure and soil conservation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 228-239.
    11. Bhuvaneswari Raman, 2015. "The Politics of Property in Land," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 10(3), pages 369-395, December.
    12. Valkonen, Anni, 2021. "Examining sources of land tenure (in)security. A focus on authority relations, state politics, social dynamics and belonging," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    13. Alonso-Fradejas, Alberto, 2021. "The resource property question in climate stewardship and sustainability transitions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    14. Przemysław Leń & Klaudia Maciąg & Michał Maciąg & Justyna Wójcik-Leń & Katarzyna Kocur-Bera, 2023. "Proposed Algorithm for the Optimisation of the Process of Generating the Geometry of Land Use/Soil Valuation Classes for Land Consolidation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Ela Ertunç, 2023. "The Effect of Land Consolidation Projects on Carbon Footprint," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Doss, Cheryl & Meinzen-Dick, Ruth, 2020. "Land tenure security for women: A conceptual framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    17. Qiqi Yin & Shenglu Zhou & Chengxiang Lv & Yang Zhang & Xueyan Sui & Xiaorui Wang, 2022. "Comprehensive Land Consolidation as a Tool to Promote Rural Restructuring in China: Theoretical Framework and Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, October.
    18. Tomáš Peráček & Mária Srebalová & Andrej Srebala, 2022. "The Valuation of Land in Land Consolidation and Relevant Administrative Procedures in the Conditions of the Slovak Republic," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, November.
    19. Yaoben Lin & Danling Chen, 2022. "Functional Zoning and Path Selection of Land Comprehensive Consolidation Based on Grey Constellation Clustering: A Case Study of Dongying City, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:135:y:2023:i:c:s026483772300412x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.