IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v135y2023ics0264837723004064.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socio-ecological impact of forest legislations on forest and forest-people of Jhargram District, West Bengal

Author

Listed:
  • Sahoo, Krishna Pada
  • Ghosh, Subhendu
  • Allarakha, Sk
  • Siddique, Giyasuddin

Abstract

For thousands of years, the first settlers of the sub-continent anchored in the vast inland forest ecosystems. These first settlers are still surviving in different residual forest patches and are known as Aboriginals or tribal people. As a livelihood strategy, forest people used to tame the services of the forest ecosystem according to their needs while maintaining a narrow ecological balance. The traditional social, cultural, and religious practices and beliefs of the forest people were not devoid of the forest ecosystem. Secondary data on the overlapping of forest patches indicates their coexistence. The indigenous forest people of Jhargram district, those dependent on the services of forest ecosystems have been deeply affected by the forest policies implemented before and after India's independence. The expansion of government control over the forest resources for maximization of revenue, particularly in colonial times, paved the way to restrict forest people to access the benefits of forest ecosystem services. The main objective of this study is to analyze the impact of various regulations on forest and forest-dependent tribal people in the Jhargram District of West Bengal. The discussion has revealed some specific impacts of the forest legislation, direct and indirect in nature, on their habitat, occupation, and social and nutritional conditions. These impacts have been assessed on the basis of primary data and information generated from the field and some certain indicators. Statistical and computational techniques have been used to assess various impact. The findings attest that the effects of such legislation are consequent more upon the habitat and livelihood of the tribal groups than the non-tribal human communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Sahoo, Krishna Pada & Ghosh, Subhendu & Allarakha, Sk & Siddique, Giyasuddin, 2023. "Socio-ecological impact of forest legislations on forest and forest-people of Jhargram District, West Bengal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:135:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723004064
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106940
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723004064
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106940?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nathan, Dev & Xaxa, Virginius (ed.), 2012. "Social Exclusion and Adverse Inclusion: Development and Deprivation of Adivasis in India," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198078937.
    2. Mariko L. Frame, 2022. "Ecological Imperialism: A World‐Systems Approach," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 81(3), pages 503-534, May.
    3. Ambe J. Njoh, 2022. "French Ecological Imperialism: A Postcolonial Approach," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 81(3), pages 581-619, May.
    4. Krott, Max, 2012. "Value and risks of the use of analytical theory in science for forest policy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 35-42.
    5. Rasmussen, Laura Vang & Watkins, Cristy & Agrawal, Arun, 2017. "Forest contributions to livelihoods in changing agriculture-forest landscapes," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1-8.
    6. Ekanayake Mudiyanselage Buddhika Piumali Ekanayake & Murindahabi Theodore, 2017. "Forest Policy for Sustainability of Sri Lanka’s Forest," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 6(01), pages 28-33, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diane Coffey & Ashwini Deshpande & Jeffrey Hammer & Dean Spears, 2019. "Local Social Inequality, Economic Inequality, and Disparities in Child Height in India," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 56(4), pages 1427-1452, August.
    2. Krott, Max & Bader, Axel & Schusser, Carsten & Devkota, Rosan & Maryudi, Ahmad & Giessen, Lukas & Aurenhammer, Helene, 2014. "Actor-centred power: The driving force in decentralised community based forest governance," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 34-42.
    3. Muhammad Zada & Syed Jamal Shah & Cao Yukun & Tariq Rauf & Naveed Khan & Syed Asad Ali Shah, 2019. "Impact of Small-to-Medium Size Forest Enterprises on Rural Livelihood: Evidence from Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Tripathi, Vinayak R. & Popli, Manish & Gaur, Ajai, 2022. "Spirituality meets science: Impact of founders’ imprint on healthcare practices for marginal communities in India," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 311-323.
    5. Edwin Sabuhoro & Brett A. Wright & Ian E. Munanura & Peter Mkumbo & Katie P. Bernhard & John T. Mgonja, 2022. "Livelihood Security and Perceived Prevalence of Illegal Activities Threatening Mountain Gorilla Conservation in East Africa’s Virunga Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Harbi, Jun & Erbaugh, James Thomas & Sidiq, Mohammad & Haasler, Berthold & Nurrochmat, Dodik Ridho, 2018. "Making a bridge between livelihoods and forest conservation: Lessons from non timber forest products' utilization in South Sumatera, Indonesia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1-10.
    7. Taye, Fitalew Agimass & Folkersen, Maja Vinde & Fleming, Christopher M. & Buckwell, Andrew & Mackey, Brendan & Diwakar, K.C. & Le, Dung & Hasan, Syezlin & Ange, Chantal Saint, 2021. "The economic values of global forest ecosystem services: A meta-analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    8. Baral, Sony & Chhetri, Bir Bahadur Khanal & Baral, Himlal & Vacik, Harald, 2019. "Investments in different taxonomies of goods: What should Nepal's community forest user groups prioritize?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 24-32.
    9. Handavu, Ferdinand & Chirwa, Paxie W.C. & Syampungani, Stephen, 2019. "Socio-economic factors influencing land-use and land-cover changes in the miombo woodlands of the Copperbelt province in Zambia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 75-94.
    10. Kazungu, Moses & Zhunusova, Eliza & Yang, Anastasia Lucy & Kabwe, Gillian & Gumbo, Davison J. & Günter, Sven, 2020. "Forest use strategies and their determinants among rural households in the Miombo woodlands of the Copperbelt Province, Zambia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    11. Mengist, Wondimagegn & Soromessa, Teshome & Feyisa, Gudina Legese & Jenerette, G. Darrel, 2022. "Socio-environmental determinants of the perceived value of moist Afromontane forest ecosystem services in Kaffa Biosphere Reserve, Ethiopia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    12. Kleinschmit, Daniela & Pülzl, Helga & Secco, Laura & Sergent, Arnaud & Wallin, Ida, 2018. "Orchestration in political processes: Involvement of experts, citizens, and participatory professionals in forest policy making," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 4-15.
    13. Sarker, Pradip Kumar & Rahman, Md Saifur & Giessen, Lukas, 2018. "Regional governance by the South Asia Cooperative Environment Program (SACEP)? Institutional design and customizable regime policy offering flexible political options," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 454-470.
    14. Zhang Yiwen & Shashi Kant & Hexing Long, 2020. "Collective Action Dilemma after China’s Forest Tenure Reform: Operationalizing Forest Devolution in a Rapidly Changing Society," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, February.
    15. World Bank, 2019. "Securing Forest Tenure Rights for Rural Development," World Bank Publications - Reports 34183, The World Bank Group.
    16. Nguyen, Thanh Van & Lv, Jie Hua & Ngo, Van Quang, 2021. "Factors determining upland farmers' participation in non-timber forest product value chains for sustainable poverty reduction in Vietnam," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    17. Hasanagas, Nikolaos D., 2016. "Managing information in forest policy networks: Distinguishing the influential actors from the “postmen”," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 73-80.
    18. Aurenhammer, Peter K., 2017. "Forest land-use governance and change through Forest Owner Associations – Actors' roles and preferences in Bavaria," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(P1), pages 176-191.
    19. Adam, Ismail Abdalla Abuelbashar & Adam, Yahia Omar & Olumeh, Dennis Etemesi & Mithöfer, Dagmar, 2024. "Livelihood strategies, baobab income and income inequality: Evidence from Kordofan and Blue Nile, Sudan," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    20. Paltasingh, Tattwamasi & Paliwal, Gayatri, 2014. "Tribal Population in India: Regional Dimensions & Imperatives," Journal of Regional Development and Planning, Rajarshi Majumder, vol. 3(2), pages 27-36.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:135:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723004064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.