Author
Listed:
- Johnson, C.
- Moore, K.R.
- Johnson, D.
Abstract
An empirical study of the placer gold mining industry in Yukon, Canada reveals how small-scale mining relates to large-scale and artisanal-scale mining, historically in the Global North and in the contemporary global context. This work significantly matures the concept of small-scale mining (SSM), despite its conflation with neighbouring concept ASM. Archival and ethnographic data gathered from the industry, community, and government informants (2021 and 2022) was interpreted using Concept Evaluation Criteria, which looks at definitions, characteristics, boundaries, and preconditions and outcomes. Legislation in Yukon does not specifically separate SSM from large-scale mining (LSM) by definition, however, it does offer differentiated governance according to deposit type (i.e., Placer Mining Act). A characteristic of SSM is full legalization and formalization, however, formalization is only possible if accessible legal frameworks exist (precondition). Formalization is possible through proactive governance, and industry-community-government dynamism. Market-protective legal frameworks effectively preclude SSM from participating in stock markets but small-enterprises use independent capital, or can access alternative sources of capital to evolve into medium-scale enterprises. The Yukon's slower, smaller mining industries have endured despite the co-existence of large-scale operations and they play an active role in modern wealth distributions, economic diversification, and sustained rural economies resilient to boom-bust economies. The implications of the research are considered in the context of diversification of mining and sociological solutions to diversify responsible access to ore deposits.
Suggested Citation
Johnson, C. & Moore, K.R. & Johnson, D., 2024.
"Maturing the concept of small-scale mining (SSM) in the Global North using concept evaluation criteria on the placer mining industry in Yukon, Canada,"
Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724003453
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104978
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724003453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.