IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v91y2024ics0301420724003325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of social disruption in communities that experienced induced seismicity from hydraulic fracturing in Colorado and Oklahoma, USA

Author

Listed:
  • Long, Michael A.
  • Ritchie, Liesel A.
  • Stretesky, Paul B.
  • Sibley, Martha

Abstract

This study tests a conceptual model of perceptions of community social disruption (measured as crime and violence, boom and bust oil and gas cycles, social disruption to the community, built environment/infrastructure related concerns, family disruption, and personal life disruption) from hydraulic fracturing. Data come from a sample of 1200 households located in hydraulic fracturing communities that also experienced induced seismicity in Colorado and Oklahoma. Results of structural equation models suggests residents who (1) reside near fracking drill sites, (2) identify as racial/ethnic minorities, (3) have lower socio-economic status (4) view fracking as a risk, (5) are liberal, and (6) do not trust institutions associated with hydraulic fracturing, are all likely to report perceptions of community social disruption. These results emphasize that the perceived effects of hydraulic fracturing matter but are not experienced equally by all members of the community. As a result, environmental injustices emerge and have consequences for perceptions of community social disruption.

Suggested Citation

  • Long, Michael A. & Ritchie, Liesel A. & Stretesky, Paul B. & Sibley, Martha, 2024. "Perceptions of social disruption in communities that experienced induced seismicity from hydraulic fracturing in Colorado and Oklahoma, USA," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724003325
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724003325
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104965?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724003325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.