IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v91y2024ics0301420724001892.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From carbon-intensive to mineral resources: Barriers and motivators for embracing natural resource in the transition process

Author

Listed:
  • Sijin Chen,
  • Ning Li,

Abstract

This study utilizes the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model to examine the complex dynamics involved in the transition from fossil fuels to mineral resources. Examining China as a case study from 2012 to 2020 reveals intricate and evolving transformations. Gaining insight into the underlying factors and obstacles in sustainable resource utilization becomes crucial for comprehending this transition. The findings provide valuable insights and identify critical factors for successful transitions. The study proposes specific objectives to support targeted policy initiatives, with the aim of preserving resources and improving productivity. This contribution provides intricate and detailed insights into the discussion on resource management and sustainable economic development. It offers a valuable guide for global policy initiatives in similar situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Sijin Chen, & Ning Li,, 2024. "From carbon-intensive to mineral resources: Barriers and motivators for embracing natural resource in the transition process," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724001892
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724001892
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104822?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s0301420724001892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.