IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v126y2024ics0305048324000367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of bank efficiency by considering the uncertainty of nonperforming loans

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Xingchen
  • Xu, Guangcheng
  • Wu, Jie
  • Xu, Chengzhen
  • Zhu, Qingyuan

Abstract

Research of banking operations has recently attracted increasing interest among bank managers and scholars, especially research on the evaluation of bank efficiency. As a prominent factor, nonperforming loans are always considered when measuring bank efficiency. Actually, the complex structures and uncertainty of non-performing loans have been neglected in previous studies. In our study, a new robust two-stage DEA (data envelopment analysis) model is proposed to analyze bank efficiency while considering the structure and uncertainty of nonperforming loans. The proposed model was utilized to assess Chinese commercial banks’ performance. Results indicated traditional model may overestimate banks’ performances, which will mislead bank decision-makers seeking to implement improvement strategies. Moreover, the majority of banks performed better in producing deposits compared with earning profits. Lastly, gaps between small medium banks and state-owned banks are still larger when considering the structure and uncertainty of nonperforming loans. Specific recommendations are proposed for each type of bank.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Xingchen & Xu, Guangcheng & Wu, Jie & Xu, Chengzhen & Zhu, Qingyuan, 2024. "Evaluation of bank efficiency by considering the uncertainty of nonperforming loans," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:126:y:2024:i:c:s0305048324000367
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2024.103069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324000367
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2024.103069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:126:y:2024:i:c:s0305048324000367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.