IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobuve/v20y2023ics2352673423000203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nascent entrepreneurs during start-up competitions: Between beauty contests and co-created problematization

Author

Listed:
  • Bastian, Bob
  • Zucchella, Antonella

Abstract

Problem-oriented research is increasingly gaining currency in entrepreneurship research. In this article, we respond to the need for more action-based perspectives in entrepreneurship. By employing an inductive research design based on qualitative interviews and participant observations, we discuss empirical evidence about two alternative problem formulation processes in the context of start-up competitions. We find that entrepreneurs may perceive start-up competitions as ‘beauty contests’, with the consequence of overpromised expectations, misaligned goals, and underutilized use of resources. The beauty contest represents a traditional interpretation of start-up competitions because it concentrates mainly on impressions and misses addressing real problems that entrepreneurs face. An alternative model for a new breed of start-up competitions is represented by co-created problematization, which challenges conventional thinking with a joint role for entrepreneurs and academics. We reflect on the mediating role of co-creation in a problem formulation process from joint problem definition toward joint problem solution, describe possible frictions, and highlight the need to re-design start-up competitions and shift towards a co-created setting where a confrontation between practitioners and academics is stimulated.

Suggested Citation

  • Bastian, Bob & Zucchella, Antonella, 2023. "Nascent entrepreneurs during start-up competitions: Between beauty contests and co-created problematization," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobuve:v:20:y:2023:i:c:s2352673423000203
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2023.e00391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352673423000203
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbvi.2023.e00391?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dean A. Shepherd & Johan Wiklund & Dimo Dimov, 2021. "Envisioning Entrepreneurship’s Future: Introducing Me-Search and Research Agendas," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(5), pages 955-966, September.
    2. Hermann Frank & Hans Landström, 2016. "What makes entrepreneurship research interesting? Reflections on strategies to overcome the rigour–relevance gap," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1-2), pages 51-75, January.
    3. Shim, Jaehu & Davidsson, Per, 2018. "Shorter than we thought: The duration of venture creation processes," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 10-16.
    4. van Burg, E. & Gilsing, V.A. & Reymen, I.M.M.J. & Romme, A.G.L., 2008. "Creating university spin-offs : A science-based design perspective," Other publications TiSEM ed13609d-fde4-43dc-ba8a-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Magnani, Giovanna & Gioia, Denny, 2023. "Using the Gioia Methodology in international business and entrepreneurship research," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2).
    6. van Werven, Ruben & Bouwmeester, Onno & Cornelissen, Joep P., 2015. "The power of arguments: How entrepreneurs convince stakeholders of the legitimate distinctiveness of their ventures," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 616-631.
    7. Newbert, Scott L. & Tornikoski, Erno T. & Augugliaro, Jeff, 2020. "To get out of the building or not? That is the question: The benefits (and costs) of customer involvement during the startup process," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    8. Gerardo Patriotta, 2017. "Crafting Papers for Publication: Novelty and Convention in Academic Writing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(5), pages 747-759, July.
    9. Li, Yongqiang & Wang, Xuehua & Huang, Lily & Bai, Xuan, 2013. "How does entrepreneurs' social capital hinder new business development? A relational embeddedness perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2418-2424.
    10. A. Georges L. Romme, 2003. "Making a Difference: Organization as Design," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(5), pages 558-573, October.
    11. Julian E. Lange & Aleksandar Mollov & Michael Pearlmutter & Sunil Singh & William D. Bygrave, 2007. "Pre-start-up formal business plans and post-start-up performance: A study of 116 new ventures," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 237-256, April.
    12. Sagath, Daniel & van Burg, Elco & Cornelissen, Joep P. & Giannopapa, Christina, 2019. "Identifying design principles for business incubation in the European space sector," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 11(C), pages 1-1.
    13. Solomon, Jill F. & Solomon, Aris & Joseph, Nathan L. & Norton, Simon D., 2013. "Impression management, myth creation and fabrication in private social and environmental reporting: Insights from Erving Goffman," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 195-213.
    14. Soheil Hooshangi & George Loewenstein, 2018. "The Impact of Idea Generation and Potential Appropriation on Entrepreneurship: An Experimental Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 64-82, January.
    15. Nambisan, Satish & Zahra, Shaker A., 2016. "The role of demand-side narratives in opportunity formation and enactment," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 70-75.
    16. Grant Savage & Michele Bunn & Barbara Gray & Qian Xiao & Sijun Wang & Elizabeth Wilson & Eric Williams, 2010. "Stakeholder Collaboration: Implications for Stakeholder Theory and Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 21-26, August.
    17. Björklund, Tua A. & Mikkonen, Maria & Mattila, Pauliina & van der Marel, Floris, 2020. "Expanding entrepreneurial solution spaces in times of crisis: Business model experimentation amongst packaged food and beverage ventures," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    18. Alain Fayolle, 2013. "Personal views on the future of entrepreneurship education," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(7-8), pages 692-701, September.
    19. Hyytinen, Ari, 2021. "Shared problem solving and design thinking in entrepreneurship research," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    20. Pablo Muñoz & Jonathan Kimmitt & Ewald Kibler & Steffen Farny, 2019. "Living on the slopes: entrepreneurial preparedness in a context under continuous threat," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5-6), pages 413-434, May.
    21. Christopher Wickert & Corinne Post & Jonathan P. Doh & John E. Prescott & Andrea Prencipe, 2021. "Management Research that Makes a Difference: Broadening the Meaning of Impact," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 297-320, March.
    22. Michael Luca & Georgios Zervas, 2016. "Fake It Till You Make It: Reputation, Competition, and Yelp Review Fraud," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(12), pages 3412-3427, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michela Loi & Alain Fayolle & Marco van Gelderen & Elen Riot & Deema Refai & David Higgins & Radi Haloub & Marcus Alexandre Yshikawa Salusse & Erwan Lamy & Caroline Verzat & Fabrice Cavarretta, 2022. "Entrepreneurship Education at the Crossroads: Challenging Taken-for-Granted Assumptions and Opening New Perspectives," Post-Print hal-03983114, HAL.
    2. Ari Hyytinen & Petri Rouvinen & Mika Pajarinen & Joosua Virtanen, 2023. "Ex Ante Predictability of Rapid Growth: A Design Science Approach," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(6), pages 2465-2493, November.
    3. Harrison, Richard T., 2023. "W(h)ither entrepreneurship? Discipline, legitimacy and super-wicked problems on the road to nowhere," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    4. Scheidgen, Katharina & Gümüsay, Ali Aslan & Günzel-Jensen, Franziska & Krlev, Gorgi & Wolf, Miriam, 2021. "Crises and entrepreneurial opportunities: Digital social innovation in response to physical distancing," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 15(C).
    5. Russ McBride & Mark D. Packard & Brent B. Clark, 2024. "Rogue Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 48(1), pages 392-417, January.
    6. Léo-Paul Dana & Edoardo Crocco & Francesca Culasso & Elisa Giacosa, 2023. "Business plan competitions and nascent entrepreneurs: a systematic literature review and research agenda," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 863-895, June.
    7. Birdthistle, Naomi & Eversole, Robyn & Walo, Megerssa, 2022. "Creating an inclusive entrepreneurial ecosystem for women entrepreneurs in a rural region," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 18(C).
    8. Hyytinen, Ari, 2021. "Shared problem solving and design thinking in entrepreneurship research," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    9. Shahid Qureshi & Sarfraz Mian, 2021. "Transfer of entrepreneurship education best practices from business schools to engineering and technology institutions: evidence from Pakistan," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 366-392, April.
    10. M. Narciso, 2022. "The Unreliability of Online Review Mechanisms," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 349-368, September.
    11. Gary Bolton & Kevin Breuer & Ben Greiner & Axel Ockenfels, 2023. "Fixing feedback revision rules in online markets," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 247-256, April.
    12. Awad, Mohamed Hassan, 2023. "Everything, all the time: Engaging the social problem of homelessness in entrepreneurship research and practice," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 20(C).
    13. Maria Ripollés & Andreu Blesa, 2020. "And yet, non-equity cooperative entries do improve international performance: uncovering the role of networks’ social capital," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 761-776, October.
    14. Andrew Crane & Sarah Glozer, 2016. "Researching Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Themes, Opportunities and Challenges," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(7), pages 1223-1252, November.
    15. Sungsik Park & Woochoel Shin & Jinhong Xie, 2021. "The Fateful First Consumer Review," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 481-507, May.
    16. Mayer-Haug, Katrin & Read, Stuart & Brinckmann, Jan & Dew, Nicholas & Grichnik, Dietmar, 2013. "Entrepreneurial talent and venture performance: A meta-analytic investigation of SMEs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 1251-1273.
    17. Lingfang (Ivy) Li & Steven Tadelis & Xiaolan Zhou, 2020. "Buying reputation as a signal of quality: Evidence from an online marketplace," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 51(4), pages 965-988, December.
    18. Ferry, Laurence & Zakaria, Zamzulaila & Zakaria, Zarina & Slack, Richard, 2018. "Framing public governance in Malaysia: Rhetorical appeals through accrual accounting," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 170-183.
    19. Per Davidsson, 2023. "Making contributions: personal reflections from the co-creative evolution of entrepreneurship research," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1391-1410, December.
    20. Hoffmann, Robert & Chesney, Thomas & Chuah, Swee-Hoon & Kock, Florian & Larner, Jeremy, 2020. "Demonstrability, difficulty and persuasion: An experimental study of advice taking," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobuve:v:20:y:2023:i:c:s2352673423000203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-business-venturing-insights .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.