IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijoais/v34y2019ic4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of the voluntary adoption of digital reporting by small private companies to Companies House: Evidence from the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Alkhatib, Esra'a
  • Ojala, Hannu
  • Collis, Jill

Abstract

This study examines the factors that influence the voluntary adoption of the digital reporting of the statutory accounts and returns to the company registry (Companies House) by small private companies in the UK. We analyse survey data from 343 members of the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants working in small companies or in practices with small company clients in the UK. The data is examined using statistical methods, mainly PLS-SEM. Our results show the following factors positively influence the voluntary adoption of digital reporting by small private companies: the relative advantage from standardisation benefits, the company's technology competence and support from top management. We also provide evidence that the complexity of the company's accounting system and technology costs inversely influence this voluntary adoption. The study contributes to the emerging literature by expanding our understanding of how the standardisation of financial information flows benefits small private companies. The results should be of interest to small companies and their accountants, regulators in the UK and other jurisdictions planning digital reporting initiatives or seeking to reduce administrative burdens on smaller entities.

Suggested Citation

  • Alkhatib, Esra'a & Ojala, Hannu & Collis, Jill, 2019. "Determinants of the voluntary adoption of digital reporting by small private companies to Companies House: Evidence from the UK," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 1-1.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:34:y:2019:i:c:4
    DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2019.06.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467089518301441
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.accinf.2019.06.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bonsón, E. & Cortijo, V. & Escobar, T., 2009. "Towards the global adoption of XBRL using International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 46-60.
    2. Dhole, Sandip & Lobo, Gerald J. & Mishra, Sagarika & Pal, Ananda M., 2015. "Effects of the SEC's XBRL mandate on financial reporting comparability," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 29-44.
    3. Cohen, Eric E. & Debreceny, Roger & Farewell, Stephanie & Roohani, Saeed, 2014. "Issues with the communication and integrity of audit reports when financial reporting shifts to an information-centric paradigm," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 400-422.
    4. Henderson, Dave & Sheetz, Steven D. & Trinkle, Brad S., 2012. "The determinants of inter-organizational and internal in-house adoption of XBRL: A structural equation model," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 109-140.
    5. Kevin Zhu & Kenneth L. Kraemer, 2005. "Post-Adoption Variations in Usage and Value of E-Business by Organizations: Cross-Country Evidence from the Retail Industry," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 61-84, March.
    6. Paul Chwelos & Izak Benbasat & Albert S. Dexter, 2001. "Research Report: Empirical Test of an EDI Adoption Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 304-321, September.
    7. Diamantopoulos, Adamantios & Riefler, Petra & Roth, Katharina P., 2008. "Advancing formative measurement models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(12), pages 1203-1218, December.
    8. Michael L. Katz & Carl Shapiro, 1994. "Systems Competition and Network Effects," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 93-115, Spring.
    9. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    10. Premuroso, Ronald F. & Bhattacharya, Somnath, 2008. "Do early and voluntary filers of financial information in XBRL format signal superior corporate governance and operating performance?," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20.
    11. Sarstedt, Marko & Ringle, Christian M. & Smith, Donna & Reams, Russell & Hair, Joseph F., 2014. "Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 105-115.
    12. O'Riain, Seán & Curry, Edward & Harth, Andreas, 2012. "XBRL and open data for global financial ecosystems: A linked data approach," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 141-162.
    13. Andy Lymer & Ann Hansford & Katy Pilkington, 2012. "Developments in tax e‐filing: practical views from the coalface," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(3), pages 212-225, November.
    14. Indrit Troshani & Lee D. Parker & Andy Lymer, 2015. "Institutionalising XBRL for financial reporting: resorting to regulation," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 196-228, February.
    15. Jill Collis, 2012. "Determinants of voluntary audit and voluntary full accounts in micro- and non-micro small companies in the UK," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 441-468, September.
    16. Dunne, Theresa & Helliar, Christine & Lymer, Andy & Mousa, Rania, 2013. "Stakeholder engagement in internet financial reporting: The diffusion of XBRL in the UK," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 167-182.
    17. Eierle, Brigitte & Ojala, Hannu & Penttinen, Esko, 2014. "XBRL to enhance external financial reporting: Should we implement or not? Case Company X," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 160-170.
    18. Kevin Zhu & Kenneth L. Kraemer & Sean Xu, 2006. "The Process of Innovation Assimilation by Firms in Different Countries: A Technology Diffusion Perspective on E-Business," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(10), pages 1557-1576, October.
    19. David A. Robb & Fiona H. Rohde & Peter F. Green & Steven Cahan, 2016. "Standard Business Reporting in Australia: efficiency, effectiveness, or both?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 56(2), pages 509-544, June.
    20. Valentinetti, Diego & Rea, Michele A., 2012. "IFRS Taxonomy and financial reporting practices: The case of Italian listed companies," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 163-180.
    21. Alles, Michael & Piechocki, Maciej, 2012. "Will XBRL improve corporate governance?," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 91-108.
    22. Kathy A. Stewart & Albert H. Segars, 2002. "An Empirical Examination of the Concern for Information Privacy Instrument," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 36-49, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammad Soltani Delgosha & Tahereh Saheb & Nastaran Hajiheydari, 2021. "Modelling the Asymmetrical Relationships between Digitalisation and Sustainable Competitiveness: A Cross-Country Configurational Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 1317-1337, September.
    2. Valentinetti, Diego & Flores Muñoz, Francisco, 2021. "Internet of things: Emerging impacts on digital reporting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 549-562.
    3. Mohammad Soltani Delgosha & Tahereh Saheb & Nastaran Hajiheydari, 0. "Modelling the Asymmetrical Relationships between Digitalisation and Sustainable Competitiveness: A Cross-Country Configurational Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.
    4. Wafa Sassi & Hakim Ben Othman & Khaled Hussainey, 2023. "The determinants of eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) adoption : a cross-country study," Post-Print hal-04191489, HAL.
    5. Miścikowska Daria, 2022. "An Exploratory Study on Preparers’ Perception of ESEF Reporting: Evidence from the Warsaw Stock Exchange," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 22(1), pages 191-218, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Troshani, Indrit & Janssen, Marijn & Lymer, Andy & Parker, Lee D., 2018. "Digital transformation of business-to-government reporting: An institutional work perspective," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 17-36.
    2. Indrit Troshani & Nick Rowbottom, 2021. "Digital Corporate Reporting: Research Developments and Implications," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 31(3), pages 213-232, September.
    3. Kumar, Satish & Marrone, Mauricio & Liu, Qi & Pandey, Nitesh, 2020. "Twenty years of the International Journal of Accounting Information Systems: A bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    4. Valentinetti, Diego & Flores Muñoz, Francisco, 2021. "Internet of things: Emerging impacts on digital reporting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 549-562.
    5. Fábio Albuquerque & Paula Gomes Dos Santos, 2023. "Recent Trends in Accounting and Information System Research: A Literature Review Using Textual Analysis Tools," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-27, April.
    6. Abdalwali Lutfi & Ahmad Farhan Alshira’h & Malek Hamed Alshirah & Manaf Al-Okaily & Hamza Alqudah & Mohamed Saad & Nahla Ibrahim & Osama Abdelmaksoud, 2022. "Antecedents and Impacts of Enterprise Resource Planning System Adoption among Jordanian SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Marek Z. Reformat & Ronald R. Yager & Nhuan D. To, 2018. "Defining personalized concepts for XBRL using iPAD‐drawn fuzzy sets," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(2), pages 73-85, April.
    8. Siew, Eu-Gene & Rosli, Khairina & Yeow, Paul H.P., 2020. "Organizational and environmental influences in the adoption of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques (CAATTs) by audit firms in Malaysia," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    9. Manoj Thomas & Daniela Costa & Tiago Oliveira, 2016. "Assessing the role of IT-enabled process virtualization on green IT adoption," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 693-710, August.
    10. Henderson, Dave & Sheetz, Steven D. & Trinkle, Brad S., 2012. "The determinants of inter-organizational and internal in-house adoption of XBRL: A structural equation model," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 109-140.
    11. Pham Quoc Thuan & Nguyen Vinh Khuong & Nguyen Duong Cam Anh & Nguyen Thi Xuan Hanh & Vo Huynh Anh Thi & Tieu Ngoc Bao Tram & Chu Gia Han, 2022. "The Determinants of the Usage of Accounting Information Systems toward Operational Efficiency in Industrial Revolution 4.0: Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.
    12. Christos Bialas & Dimitrios Bechtsis & Eirini Aivazidou & Charisios Achillas & Dimitrios Aidonis, 2023. "A Holistic View on the Adoption and Cost-Effectiveness of Technology-Driven Supply Chain Management Practices in Healthcare," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Ilin, Vladimir & Ivetić, Jelena & Simić, Dragan, 2017. "Understanding the determinants of e-business adoption in ERP-enabled firms and non-ERP-enabled firms: A case study of the Western Balkan Peninsula," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 206-223.
    14. Marek Z. Reformat & Ronald R. Yager, 2015. "Soft Computing Techniques for Querying XBRL Data," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(3), pages 179-199, July.
    15. El-Gohary, Hatem, 2012. "Factors affecting E-Marketing adoption and implementation in tourism firms: An empirical investigation of Egyptian small tourism organisations," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 1256-1269.
    16. Chin-Lung Hsu & Judy Chuan-Chuan Lin, 2016. "Factors affecting the adoption of cloud services in enterprises," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 791-822, November.
    17. Jie Zhou, 2020. "Does one size fit all? Evidence on XBRL adoption and 10‐K filing lag," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 3183-3213, September.
    18. Dirk Beerbaum & Maciej Piechocki & Christoph Weber, 2017. "Is there a Conflict between Principles-based Standard Setting and Structured Electronic Reporting with XBRL?," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(3), pages 33-52.
    19. Wenjuan Xu & Peiyu Ou & Weiguo Fan, 2017. "Antecedents of ERP assimilation and its impact on ERP value: A TOE-based model and empirical test," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 13-30, February.
    20. Nam, Dalwoo & Lee, Junyeong & Lee, Heeseok, 2019. "Business analytics use in CRM: A nomological net from IT competence to CRM performance," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 233-245.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:34:y:2019:i:c:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-accounting-information-systems/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.