IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/iburev/v4y1995i2p213-231.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alliances and the pattern of comparative advantages: a sectoral analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Veugelers, Reinhilde

Abstract

The pattern of sectoral comparative advantages between the EC, US and Japan is linked to the sectoral distribution of Triad alliances to disentangle different motives and problems of alliances. In addition the impact of comparative advantages on partner selection is examined. It is found, among others, that, contrary to the US and Japan, the EC takes a more defensive stance in industries where it holds a comparative advantage, but it is more actively engaged in alliances in industries where it lacks a comparative advantage. But these weak EC partners are least likely to team up with a strong partner, as compared to US and Japanese companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Veugelers, Reinhilde, 1995. "Alliances and the pattern of comparative advantages: a sectoral analysis," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 213-231, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:4:y:1995:i:2:p:213-231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/096959319500006L
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Homin & Chen, Tain-Jy, 2002. "Asymmetric strategic alliances: A network view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(12), pages 1007-1013, December.
    2. Pastor, Maite & Sandonis, Joel, 2002. "Research joint ventures vs. cross licensing agreements: an agency approach," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 215-249, February.
    3. Chen, Homin & Chen, Tain-Jy, 2003. "Governance structures in strategic alliances: transaction cost versus resource-based perspective," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 1-14, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:4:y:1995:i:2:p:213-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/133/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.