IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/iburev/v33y2024i3s0969593124000179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shadow of the giant: How global value chain participation influences the knowledge structure of SMEs

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Yimin
  • Xin, Li

Abstract

Beyond the knowledge acquisition facilitated by global value chain (GVC) participation for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), extant studies have largely overlooked its impact on the knowledge structure (knowledge depth vs. breadth) of SMEs, whose GVC linkages are normally trapped in captive relationships dedicated to customized and exclusive tasks. Introducing an interactive perspective of power-embeddedness logic, this study examines how GVC participation affects SMEs’ knowledge structure. Based on the large longitudinal data of China’s SMEs, estimations from the Panel Fixed effects model and Negative Binomial model indicate that while GVC participation has a positive effect on knowledge depth, it has an inverted U-shaped effect on knowledge breadth. Moreover, relationship history and indigenous R&D differently moderate the effects of GVC participation on knowledge depth and breadth by influencing either power or embeddedness logic. These findings provide new insights into the complex interaction between the two logics and SMEs’ constraint response in GVC linkages through deliberate knowledge management.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Yimin & Xin, Li, 2024. "Shadow of the giant: How global value chain participation influences the knowledge structure of SMEs," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(3).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:33:y:2024:i:3:s0969593124000179
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593124000179
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102270?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:iburev:v:33:y:2024:i:3:s0969593124000179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/133/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.