IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v297y2024ics0360544224009782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance improvement analysis of the regenerative dual-pressure organic flash cycle assisted by ejectors

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Mingtao
  • Qu, Lin
  • Liu, Huanwei
  • Chen, Pengji
  • Wang, Xuan

Abstract

We proposed a dual-ejector-based regenerative dual–pressure organic flash cycle (DEj–RDPOFC) with higher performance than the RDPOFC. The effects of high and low pressures and the entrainment ratio of the ejector on the DEj–RDPOFC performance were analyzed from the viewpoints of thermodynamics and thermoeconomics. An exergy-flow distribution diagram revealed why the DEj–RDPOFC outperformed the RDPOFC. Next, the performances of the DEj–RDPOFC and dual–pressure organic Rankine cycle (DORC) were compared under the same boundary conditions. Finally, the performance of the DEj–RDPOFC was optimized using the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II). According to the results, the power output of the high-pressure (HP) turbine of the DEj–RDPOFC can be increased by replacing the HP throttling valve (TV) with an ejector (which increases the working fluid dryness of the HP vapor separator and the mass flow rate of the HP turbine) and the low-pressure (LP) TV with an ejector (which increases the HP turbine expansion ratio). The DEj–RDPOFC achieves a higher maximum net power output (Wnet) and a lower corresponding levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) than the DORC. Under the optimum condition, the Wnet and LCOE of the DEj–RDPOFC are 9.71 % higher and 6.59 % lower, respectively, than those of the RDPOFC.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Mingtao & Qu, Lin & Liu, Huanwei & Chen, Pengji & Wang, Xuan, 2024. "Performance improvement analysis of the regenerative dual-pressure organic flash cycle assisted by ejectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:297:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224009782
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.131205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224009782
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:297:y:2024:i:c:s0360544224009782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.