IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v144y2018icp619-626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thin film membrane for CO2 separation with sweeping gas method

Author

Listed:
  • Ben-Mansour, R.
  • Li, H.
  • Habib, M.A.

Abstract

Different from gases separation technology using membranes and solvent, solvent-free gas separation technology is more economically and energy efficient. Due to its inherent low permeance of the membrane, the means using sweeping or vacuum are two main options to increase the mass flow rate of the fast gas (with higher selectivity) on the permeate side. This study models a typical membrane for CO2 separation and investigates the effects of different parameters on the total mass flow rate, mass fraction of CO2 and the mass flow rate of CO2 in the permeate outlet. These parameters are the permeate outlet pressure, mass flow rate of mixed feeding and sweeping gases, membrane length and the height of gases zones. The results show that the mass flow rate of CO2 in the permeate side can be enhanced dramatically by using sweeping gas method. But the mass fraction of CO2 in permeate outlet is also significantly affected by this method. The increase of membrane length enhances both the mass fraction and mass flow rate of CO2 in permeate outlet. But mass fraction of CO2 on permeate outlet reaches its peak when membrane length exceeds 150 mm. The height of gases zones, however, have very limited effects on both the mass fraction and mass flow rate of CO2 in the permeate outlet. This study provides a good guideline for designing industrial gases separation systems using membranes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben-Mansour, R. & Li, H. & Habib, M.A., 2018. "Thin film membrane for CO2 separation with sweeping gas method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 619-626.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:144:y:2018:i:c:p:619-626
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217321291
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leung, Dennis Y.C. & Caramanna, Giorgio & Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes, 2014. "An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 426-443.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdolahi-Mansoorkhani, Hamed & Seddighi, Sadegh, 2019. "H2S and CO2 capture from gaseous fuels using nanoparticle membrane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 847-857.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liang, Ying & Cai, Lei & Guan, Yanwen & Liu, Wenbin & Xiang, Yanlei & Li, Juan & He, Tianzhi, 2020. "Numerical study on an original oxy-fuel combustion power plant with efficient utilization of flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Gintautas Mozgeris & Daiva Juknelienė, 2021. "Modeling Future Land Use Development: A Lithuanian Case," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Balcombe, Paul & Speirs, Jamie & Johnson, Erin & Martin, Jeanne & Brandon, Nigel & Hawkes, Adam, 2018. "The carbon credentials of hydrogen gas networks and supply chains," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1077-1088.
    4. Pellegrino, Sandro & Lanzini, Andrea & Leone, Pierluigi, 2017. "Greening the gas network – The need for modelling the distributed injection of alternative fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 266-286.
    5. Drissi, Sarra & Ling, Tung-Chai & Mo, Kim Hung & Eddhahak, Anissa, 2019. "A review of microencapsulated and composite phase change materials: Alteration of strength and thermal properties of cement-based materials," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 467-484.
    6. Zhang, Xiaoyue & Huang, Guohe & Liu, Lirong & Li, Kailong, 2022. "Development of a stochastic multistage lifecycle programming model for electric power system planning – A case study for the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. José Luis Míguez & Jacobo Porteiro & Raquel Pérez-Orozco & Miguel Ángel Gómez, 2018. "Technology Evolution in Membrane-Based CCS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    8. Vinca, Adriano & Rottoli, Marianna & Marangoni, Giacomo & Tavoni, Massimo, 2017. "The Role of Carbon Capture and Storage Electricity in Attaining 1.5 and 2°C," MITP: Mitigation, Innovation and Transformation Pathways 266285, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    9. Ganesh, Ibram, 2016. "Electrochemical conversion of carbon dioxide into renewable fuel chemicals – The role of nanomaterials and the commercialization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1269-1297.
    10. Li, Qing & Zhang, Huaige & Hong, Xianpei, 2020. "Knowledge structure of technology licensing based on co-keywords network: A review and future directions," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 154-165.
    11. Zhang, Shuai & Liu, Linlin & Zhang, Lei & Zhuang, Yu & Du, Jian, 2018. "An optimization model for carbon capture utilization and storage supply chain: A case study in Northeastern China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 194-206.
    12. Liu, Quanyou & Zhu, Dongya & Jin, Zhijun & Tian, Hailong & Zhou, Bing & Jiang, Peixue & Meng, Qingqiang & Wu, Xiaoqi & Xu, Huiyuan & Hu, Ting & Zhu, Huixing, 2023. "Carbon capture and storage for long-term and safe sealing with constrained natural CO2 analogs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    13. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2020. "Energy and cost efficient manganese chemical looping air separation cycle for decarbonized power generation based on oxy-fuel combustion and gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    14. Giorgetti, S. & Bricteux, L. & Parente, A. & Blondeau, J. & Contino, F. & De Paepe, W., 2017. "Carbon capture on micro gas turbine cycles: Assessment of the performance on dry and wet operations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 243-253.
    15. Silvana Fais & Giuseppe Casula & Francesco Cuccuru & Paola Ligas & Maria Giovanna Bianchi & Alberto Plaisant & Alberto Pettinau, 2019. "A Contribution to the Geological Characterization of a Potential Caprock-Reservoir System in the Sulcis Coal Basin (South-Western Sardinia)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-37, November.
    16. Niu, Daming & Sun, Pingchang & Ma, Lin & Zhao, Kang'an & Ding, Cong, 2023. "Porosity evolution of Minhe oil shale under an open rapid heating system and the carbon storage potentials," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 783-799.
    17. Cavalcanti, Eduardo J.C. & Lima, Matheus S.R. & de Souza, Gabriel F., 2020. "Comparison of carbon capture system and concentrated solar power in natural gas combined cycle: Exergetic and exergoenvironmental analyses," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1336-1347.
    18. Rosa, Lorenzo & Sanchez, Daniel L. & Realmonte, Giulia & Baldocchi, Dennis & D'Odorico, Paolo, 2021. "The water footprint of carbon capture and storage technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    19. Janusz Zdeb & Natalia Howaniec & Adam Smoliński, 2019. "Utilization of Carbon Dioxide in Coal Gasification—An Experimental Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, January.
    20. Amigues, Jean-Pierre & Moreaux, Michel, 2019. "Energy Conversion Rate Improvements, Pollution Abatement Efforts and Energy Mix: The Transition toward the Green Economy under a Pollution Stock Constraint," TSE Working Papers 19-994, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:144:y:2018:i:c:p:619-626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.