IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v189y2024ics0301421524001344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Derivatives and hedging practices in the Australian National Electricity Market

Author

Listed:
  • Flottmann, Jonty
  • Wild, Phillip
  • Todorova, Neda

Abstract

This article expands on the seminal policy work by Anderson et al. (2007) and explores the impacts of a changing energy mix on derivatives and hedging practices 15 years on from their work in the Australian National Electricity Market (NEM). The NEM has undergone vast change since 2007 as variable renewable energy (VRE) has entered the market. This can have a significant impact on the contracting patterns and derivatives’ use of participants. A survey was undertaken to determine how market participants in the NEM conduct derivatives trading and hedging of their portfolios. Additionally, participants shared their views on the current state of energy policy and operation of the market. The results showed participants continue to use derivatives, as was previously documented, with increasing focus on power purchase agreements (PPA) for VRE contracting and a sharp drop in the use of traditional peak contracts. Nonetheless, there arose apprehension regarding participants' future capacity to hedge portfolios, given the diminishing liquidity within the derivative market due to the departure of dispatchable plants. This poses a difficult path for policy makers and regulators as a functioning and active derivative market is integral for the operation of an energy only market such as the NEM.

Suggested Citation

  • Flottmann, Jonty & Wild, Phillip & Todorova, Neda, 2024. "Derivatives and hedging practices in the Australian National Electricity Market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:189:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524001344
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524001344
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:189:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524001344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.