IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v188y2024ics0301421524000806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon literacy – Can simple interventions help? Effect of information provision on emissions knowledge of private households

Author

Listed:
  • Kretschmer, Sandra

Abstract

Understanding public perceptions of various carbon abatement behaviours and how these can be influenced with informational interventions is an essential prerequisite to encourage low-carbon behaviour. By means of a survey experiment among a representative sample of 1492 German households, I evaluate individual carbon literacy, i.e. the ability to perceive the carbon emissions associated with individual actions, based on a ranking task of abatement behaviours. Using two treatment interventions, I test whether simple information provision in the form of a ranking of the most carbon-intense household actions or a heuristic for carbon intensities can correct misperceptions and thus increase carbon literacy. The results show that Germans severely underestimate the abatement potential of reduced meat consumption, avoiding food waste, and to a lesser extent of not driving a car, while they overestimate the potential of recycling and avoiding plastic bags. While the heuristic fails to increase carbon literacy, the ranking does so by a significant amount. In particular, it corrects the perceptions of the top mitigating actions. However, the severe underestimation of a vegetarian diet and avoiding food waste persists. This indicates that especially the underestimation of food-related emissions is deep-rooted.

Suggested Citation

  • Kretschmer, Sandra, 2024. "Carbon literacy – Can simple interventions help? Effect of information provision on emissions knowledge of private households," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:188:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524000806
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524000806
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:188:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524000806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.