IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v132y2024ics0140988324002020.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing mechanisms through which China's ETS promotes a low-carbon transition

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Feng
  • van den Bergh, Jeroen
  • Wei, Yihang

Abstract

China regards an emission trading scheme (ETS) as the most promising approach for reducing its carbon dioxide emissions. However, there are still disagreements about the effectiveness of China's ETS (CETS). To settle this issue, we test the impact of CETS on key mechanisms driving a low-carbon transition. We use the difference-in-difference method to analyze data for coal-power plants participating in China's carbon trading pilot. This involves the use of two variables based on life-cycle indicators, namely ‘energy return on energy invested’ (EROI) and ‘energy return on carbon invested’ (EROC). We obtain three main findings: (1) a mediating effect of supply-side reform is significant; (2) this effect is stronger for more intense technological innovation and government intervention; (3) the influence of CETS on a low-carbon transition is independent of the development of clean energy. Overall, we conclude that the scope of CETS should be extended to other emitters to fully unleash its potential for reducing carbon emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Feng & van den Bergh, Jeroen & Wei, Yihang, 2024. "Testing mechanisms through which China's ETS promotes a low-carbon transition," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:132:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324002020
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988324002020
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107494?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:132:y:2024:i:c:s0140988324002020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.