IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v316y2024i3p930-941.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to optimize container withholding decisions for reuse in the hinterland?

Author

Listed:
  • Legros, Benjamin
  • Fransoo, Jan
  • Jouini, Oualid

Abstract

This study investigates how a hinterland consignee (importer) makes decisions regarding the storage of empty containers for reuse by a shipper (exporter). The system is modeled as a double-ended queue with non-zero matching times, limited truck resources, and both consignee and shipper having fixed withholding capacities. The consignee’s withholding threshold is strategically set to minimize overall transport and detention costs. We derive closed-form expressions for performance measures in the case of a single storage facility at the shipper, utilizing a matrix-based approach. We extend this methodology numerically to the general case. Additionally, we present an accurate fixed-point approximation facilitating the determination of performance measures and optimal threshold. Our findings show the importance of withholding decisions in import and balanced areas for cost reduction. In export areas, a policy of full reuse proves nearly optimal. Analyzing dynamic state-dependent consignee decisions via a Markov decision process, we establish that the optimal policy involves withholding thresholds increasing with stored quantity at the shipper. While optimal, state-dependent thresholds yield limited cost savings compared to a fixed threshold, suggesting minimal impact from consignee-shipper information sharing. Additionally, we examine the influence of variability in matching and production times, observing decreased costs with reduced variability, particularly in export areas, but with minor impacts on withholding decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Legros, Benjamin & Fransoo, Jan & Jouini, Oualid, 2024. "How to optimize container withholding decisions for reuse in the hinterland?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(3), pages 930-941.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:316:y:2024:i:3:p:930-941
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.02.035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722172400167X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.02.035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:316:y:2024:i:3:p:930-941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.