IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v316y2024i3p1101-1113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A sample robust optimal bidding model for a virtual power plant

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Seokwoo
  • Choi, Dong Gu

Abstract

In many energy markets, the trade amount of electricity must be committed to before the actual supply. This study explores one consecutive operational challenge for a virtual power plant—the optimal bidding for highly uncertain distributed energy resources in a day-ahead electricity market. The optimal bidding problem is formulated as a scenario-based multi-stage stochastic optimization model. However, the scenario-tree approach raises two consequent issues—scenario overfitting and massive computation cost. This study addresses the issues by deploying a sample robust optimization approach with linear decision rules. A tractable robust counterpart is derived from the model where the uncertainty appears in a nonlinear objective and constraints. By applying the decision rules to the balancing policy, the original model can be reduced to a two-stage stochastic mixed-integer programming model and then efficiently solved by adopting a dual decomposition method combined with heuristics. Based on real-world business data, a numerical experiment is conducted with several benchmark models. The results verify the superior performance of our proposed approach based on increased out-of-sample profits and decreased overestimation of in-sample profits.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Seokwoo & Choi, Dong Gu, 2024. "A sample robust optimal bidding model for a virtual power plant," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(3), pages 1101-1113.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:316:y:2024:i:3:p:1101-1113
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.03.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221724001759
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.03.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:316:y:2024:i:3:p:1101-1113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.