IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v316y2024i3p1058-1069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Propensity score oversampling and matching for uplift modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Vairetti, Carla
  • Gennaro, Franco
  • Maldonado, Sebastián

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a novel matching strategy to correct for confounding in uplift modeling. Our method, called propensity score oversampling and matching (ProSOM), extends the well-known propensity score matching (PSM) technique by addressing one of its main limitations: dealing with small datasets that face an imbalance in the distribution of the causal variable. Apart from this, we also face the additional complexity of dealing with class labels. The proposed method establishes a parallel between uplift modeling and class-imbalance classification as it extends existing oversampling techniques to create synthetic elements from the treatment group. We design an algorithm that performs classaware data oversampling in the treatment group, and then it matches samples from this group with the control group. This can be seen as a novel hybrid undersampling-oversampling solution for causal learning. Experiments on five datasets show the virtues of ProSOM in terms of predictive performance, achieving the best Qini coefficient for all five datasets in relation to PSM and other resampling solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Vairetti, Carla & Gennaro, Franco & Maldonado, Sebastián, 2024. "Propensity score oversampling and matching for uplift modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(3), pages 1058-1069.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:316:y:2024:i:3:p:1058-1069
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2024.03.024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722172400225X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.03.024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:316:y:2024:i:3:p:1058-1069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.