IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v160y2024ics0190740924001609.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What do we know about children’s representation in child protection decisions? A scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Haarberg, Frøydis Lønborg

Abstract

This scoping review presents an overview of existing research about children’s representation in child protection decision-making and identifies the knowledge gaps. Representation arrangements to ensure that children’s views and/or best interests are heard are crucial as children, caregivers, and social workers often cannot represent children adequately. This international peer-reviewed scoping review entails an extensive search for peer-reviewed research articles in English and Norwegian, published between 1990 and 2022, identifying 51 relevant studies from 7800 unique articles. Thematic analysis revealed that existing research has examined various dimensions of how representation is carried out and perceived, including representatives’ roles, child—representative contact, and the value of representation. Children often lacked representation and commented on relationships and representation being valuable. While the knowledge base is stronger in these areas, it is clear that we do not know much about children’s representation overall. There are considerable knowledge gaps related to a predominance of small-scale qualitative studies, brief coverage of some subdimensions of representation, and several studies with a broader research focus than representation. Following the direction of this scoping review, future research should focus on patching up the research gaps on children’s representation in child protection decision-making. By identifying the existing research base and frontier, we can prioritize new research, test existing knowledge, and make arrangements that benefit children.

Suggested Citation

  • Haarberg, Frøydis Lønborg, 2024. "What do we know about children’s representation in child protection decisions? A scoping review," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:160:y:2024:i:c:s0190740924001609
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107588
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740924001609
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107588?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:160:y:2024:i:c:s0190740924001609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.