IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v160y2024ics0190740924001440.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk of child sexual abuse: A mixed-methods analysis of judicial decisions in the Youth Court of Québec

Author

Listed:
  • Buisson, Camille
  • Poitras, Karine
  • Joyal, Christian C.

Abstract

In Québec, Canada, the Youth Protection Act allows child protection services to intervene in situations of serious risk of sexual abuse. Although the litigation of these cases is frequent, few studies have focused on the decision-making process of judges in Youth Court. The present study aims to document the criteria used by the judges to substantiate allegation of serious risk of sexual abuse and to render a placement order. Using a sequential explanatory mixed-method design, we analyzed 104 judicial decisions of the Youth Court of Québec between January 2016 and January 2023 involving a situation of risk of sexual abuse in families with children aged 0 to 12 years. The quantitative phase of the study revealed that psychosocial difficulties of children and parents, as well as the number of reasons for intervention are associated to a placement order. Based on a thematic analysis (n = 24), the qualitative phase of the study highlighted three main types of criteria used by the judges to substantiate allegation of serious risk of sexual abuse: 1) the vulnerability of the child; 2) the characteristics of the family system; and 3) the parents' compliance with external demands.

Suggested Citation

  • Buisson, Camille & Poitras, Karine & Joyal, Christian C., 2024. "Risk of child sexual abuse: A mixed-methods analysis of judicial decisions in the Youth Court of Québec," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:160:y:2024:i:c:s0190740924001440
    DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740924001440
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107572?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:160:y:2024:i:c:s0190740924001440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.