IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v363y2024ics0306261924004434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Load configuration impact on energy community and distribution grid: Quantifying costs, emissions and grid exchange

Author

Listed:
  • Berg, Kjersti
  • Hernandez-Matheus, Alejandro
  • Aragüés-Peñalba, Mònica
  • Bullich-Massagué, Eduard
  • Farahmand, Hossein

Abstract

Energy communities are emerging across Europe, and each country is currently in the process of forming regulations for their integration into the electricity grid. The efficacy of energy communities depends upon various factors, including member demographics, technological aspects, load profiles, solar irradiation, and spot prices within the community’s geographical location. Notably, existing studies on energy communities predominantly focus on residential load profiles, with limited exploration into their impact on the distribution grid. This article aims to contribute to the existing literature by investigating the benefits of energy communities and their grid impact under diverse member configurations. Our approach involves the development of an optimisation model incorporating battery energy storage and shiftable loads, aimed at minimising the operational costs of energy communities over a one-year period. Case studies in Norway and Spain, with different load configurations: residential, commercial, and mixed load, are undertaken, utilising real hourly measurements to identify operational variations influenced by geographical location and seasonal fluctuations in load and photovoltaic (PV) generation. Additionally, we quantify the costs, CO2 emissions, and self-consumption rates for energy communities. Furthermore, we assess the distribution grid impact in terms of import and export dynamics. The results underscore the substantial influence of load configurations on member benefits and distribution grid impacts, attributable to the inherent correlation between load and PV generation. In the context of energy community benefits, commercial loads demonstrate the best outcomes in Norway, whereas residential loads exhibit superior results in Spain. Conversely, concerning distribution grid impact, commercial loads prove most advantageous in Norway, while mixed loads yield the best results in Spain. Overall, our findings indicate that Spanish energy communities consistently achieve more substantial reductions in costs and CO2 emissions compared to their Norwegian counterparts, irrespective of the load configuration. This study contributes valuable insights for policymakers, researchers, and industry stakeholders involved in the development and regulation of energy communities across Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Berg, Kjersti & Hernandez-Matheus, Alejandro & Aragüés-Peñalba, Mònica & Bullich-Massagué, Eduard & Farahmand, Hossein, 2024. "Load configuration impact on energy community and distribution grid: Quantifying costs, emissions and grid exchange," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 363(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:363:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924004434
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924004434
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:363:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924004434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.