The extent to which specification error can explain rejection of the intertemporal capital asset pricing model is investigated using seminonparametric representations of the law of motion and utility. The authors find (1) consumption growth and asset returns display conditional heterogeneity, but this does not account for rejection of models assuming additively separable, constant relative risk aversion utility; (2) the model is accepted upon relaxation of the utility function in the direction of nonseparable utility; and (3) relaxation reduces overprediction of the conditional variance of consumption growth, overprediction of the conditional covariance of asset returns with consumption growth, and the equity premium. Copyright 1989 by The Econometric Society.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Publisher Info
Article provided by Econometric Society in its journal Econometrica.
Volume (Year): 57 (1989) Issue (Month): 5 (September) Pages: 1091-1120 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.) This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page.