IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwvjh/84-1-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspektive der Industrie in Deutschland

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Gornig
  • Alexander Schiersch

Abstract

The rise of China into the ranks of the industrialized nations has characterized the last 15 years. China significantly increased its share in global industrial production. At the same time, the USA and most Western European countries experienced severe deindustrialization. Only a few countries, for instance Germany, did not develop accordingly. In fact, the German industry managed to grow at the same pace as global industry production and was able to maintain its market share. Inter alia, this success was due to an industry structure which focused on medium-tech and high-tech sectors. The total value added share of such industries of has increased significantly in 2000-12. Such industries include, but are not limited to chemistry, electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, automotive manufacturing, pharmaceutical, medical devices or aircraft. However, we can identify a remarkable shortage of investments in the German manufacturing industry. In the 2000-12 periodthe modernity of the capital stock, measured as the real fixed capital formation in relation to the real fixed capital stock, was below that of many competitors. Even successful sectors, such as the manufacture of machinery and the manufacture of motor vehicles, invested less, given their capital stock, than the sector specific international average. This distinct weakness of investment is a clear warning signal, which calls for an active industry policy. Nowadays, industry policy implies, first and foremost, innovation policy. However, it should not be confined to the provision of research infrastructure, but must actually butt innovation clusters. In addition, it is important to closely interlinking innovation policy with the creation of an efficient education and training system, an investment-friendly tax policy and a future-oriented environmental policy. Der Wandel der globalen Industrieproduktion in den letzten 15 Jahren ist vor allem durch den Aufstieg Chinas zur Industrienation gekennzeichnet. Die Marktanteilsgewinne Chinas führten insbesondere zu relativen Verlusten bei der Industrieproduktion in den USA und Westeuropa. In vielen westlichen Ländern ist zudem ein ausgeprägter De-Industrialisierungsprozess zu beobachten. Nur wenige Länder, darunter Deutschland, konnten sich diesem Prozess entziehen. Eine wesentliche Ursache für den Erfolg der deutschen Industrie ist die Spezialisierung auf Branchen der Hoch- und Spitzentechnologie. Der Anteil von Branchen wie Chemie, Elektrotechnik, Maschinen- und Anlagenbau, Straßenfahrzeugbau, Pharmazie, Medizintechnik oder Luftfahrzeugbau an der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Wertschöpfung hat in Deutschland von 2000 bis 2012 deutlich zugenommen. Dennoch weist das deutsche Verarbeitende Gewerbe eine ausgeprägte Investitionsschwäche auf. Zwischen 2000 und 2012 lag der Modernitätsgrad des Kapitalstocks (reale Bruttoinvestitionen in Relation zum Kapitalbestand) unter dem wichtiger Wettbewerber in der EU und außerhalb Europas. Selbst so erfolgreiche Branchen wie der Straßenfahrzeug- oder der Maschinenbau weisen im internationalen Vergleich einen deutlichen Investitionsrückstand auf. Erfolg von gestern ist nicht gleichbedeutend mit Erfolg von morgen. Die ausgeprägte Investitionsschwäche ist dabei ein deutliches Warnsignal. Umso bedeutender für den künftigen Erfolg des Industriestandortes Deutschland ist eine aktive Industriepolitik. Industriepolitik ist dabei zu allererst Innovationspolitik. Sie darf allerdings nicht auf die Bereitstellung der Forschungsinfrastruktur beschränkt bleiben, sondern muss konkret Innovationscluster anstoßen. Zudem gilt es, sie eng zu verzahnen mit der Schaffung eines leistungsfähigen Bildungs- und Ausbildungssystems, einer investitionsfreundlichen Steuerpolitik und eines zukunftsorientierten Umweltpolitik.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Gornig & Alexander Schiersch, 2015. "Perspektive der Industrie in Deutschland," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 84(1), pages 37-54.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:84-1-3
    DOI: 10.3790/vjh.84.1.37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.84.1.37
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3790/vjh.84.1.37?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan S. Blinder, 1973. "Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimates," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 8(4), pages 436-455.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Y. Mathä & Alessandro Porpiglia & Michael Ziegelmeyer, 2014. "Wealth differences across borders and the effect of real estate price dynamics: Evidence from two household surveys," BCL working papers 90, Central Bank of Luxembourg.
    2. Johar, Meliyanni & Soewondo, Prastuti & Pujisubekti, Retno & Satrio, Harsa Kunthara & Adji, Ardi, 2018. "Inequality in access to health care, health insurance and the role of supply factors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 134-145.
    3. García-Suaza, A & Rodríguez-González, D & Sarango, A & Mayorga, J. D & Pretel, A & Husain-Talero, S & Zarama, L & Urbano, J. C., Girón, D., Medina, N, 2022. "Los impactos de la inclusión financiera en los micronegocios: factores que explican aumentos en los ingresos y crecimiento de los negocios," Documentos de Trabajo 20418, Universidad del Rosario.
    4. Matias Busso & Patrick Kline, 2008. "Do Local Economic Development Programs Work? Evidence from the Federal Empowerment Zone Program," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1639, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    5. Senik, Claudia, 2014. "The French unhappiness puzzle: The cultural dimension of happiness," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 379-401.
    6. Frank Cowell & Carlo Fiorio, 2011. "Inequality decompositions—a reconciliation," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 9(4), pages 509-528, December.
    7. Henry Renski, 2018. "Estimating the Returns to Professional Certifications and Licenses in the U.S. Manufacturing Sector," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 32(4), pages 341-356, November.
    8. Marco Caliendo & Frank M. Fossen & Alexander Kritikos & Miriam Wetter, 2015. "The Gender Gap in Entrepreneurship: Not just a Matter of Personality," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 61(1), pages 202-238.
    9. Alison L. Booth, 2006. "The Glass Ceiling in Europe: Why Are Women Doing Badly in the Labour Market?," CEPR Discussion Papers 542, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.
    10. Valentine Fays & Benoît Mahy & François Rycx, 2023. "Wage differences according to workers' origin: The role of working more upstream in GVCs," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 37(2), pages 319-342, June.
    11. Michael E. Martell & Peyton Nash, 2020. "For Love and Money? Earnings and Marriage Among Same-Sex Couples," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 260-294, September.
    12. Oglobin, C., 2005. "The Gender Earnings Differential in Russia After a Decade of Economic Transition," Applied Econometrics and International Development, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 5(3).
    13. Ewa Cukrowska-Torzewska & Anna Lovasz, 2016. "Are children driving the gender wage gap?," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 24(2), pages 259-297, April.
    14. Ikechukwu Darlington Nwaka & Fatma Guven-Lisaniler & Gulcay Tuna, 2016. "Gender wage differences in Nigerian self and paid employment: Do marriage and children matter?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 27(4), pages 490-510, December.
    15. Deborah A. Cobb-Clark & Vincent A. Hildebrand, 2006. "The Wealth of Mexican Americans," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 41(4).
    16. Peng Nie & Lanlin Ding & Alfonso Sousa-Poza, 2020. "What Chinese Workers Value: An Analysis of Job Satisfaction, Job Expectations, and Labour Turnover in China," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2020(1), pages 85-104.
    17. Howard Bodenhorn & Christopher Ruebeck, 2007. "Colourism and African–american wealth: evidence from the nineteenth-century south," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 20(3), pages 599-620, July.
    18. Axel Heitmueller, 2004. "Job Mobility In Britain: Are The Scots Different? Evidence From The Bhps," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 51(3), pages 329-358, August.
    19. Huong Thu Le & Ha Trong Nguyen, 2018. "The evolution of the gender test score gap through seventh grade: new insights from Australia using unconditional quantile regression and decomposition," IZA Journal of Labor Economics, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 7(1), pages 1-42, December.
    20. David Madden, 2010. "Gender Differences in Mental Well-Being: a Decomposition Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 99(1), pages 101-114, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Investment; capital stock; industries;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E22 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Investment; Capital; Intangible Capital; Capacity
    • O14 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Industrialization; Manufacturing and Service Industries; Choice of Technology
    • L52 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Industrial Policy; Sectoral Planning Methods
    • O25 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Industrial Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:84-1-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.