IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwvjh/77-1-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Familie und Bildung in der Agenda 2010: Ziele, Maßnahmen und Wirkungen

Author

Listed:
  • Katharina Wrohlich

Abstract

In der Agenda 2010 werden für den Politikbereich "Familie und Bildung" insbesondere drei Problembereiche angesprochen. Zum Ersten findet sich darin die Benennung des Problems unzureichender Betreuungsmöglichkeiten für Kinder, das die Vereinbarkeit von Beruf und Familie in Deutschland erschwert. Zum Zweiten wird festgestellt, dass der Mangel an frühkindlichen Bildungs- und Betreuungsmöglichkeiten auch ein Grund für das schlechte Abschneiden deutscher Schülerinnen und Schüler bei der PISA-Studie ist. In diesem Zusammenhang wird gefordert, dass der in Deutschland stark ausgeprägte Einfuss des sozioökonomischen Hintergrunds auf die Bildungsleistung durch mehr Chancengleichheit im Bildungssystem verringert werden soll. Drittens wird in der Agenda 2010 das Problem angesprochen, dass Eltern mit niedrigem Lohneinkommen für ihre Kinder auf Leistungen der Sozialhilfe bzw. dem Arbeitslosengeld II angewiesen sind. Da diese Leistungen hohe Entzugsraten haben, sind die Anreize, eine Erwerbstätigkeit aufzunehmen, für Eltern niedriger als für Personen ohne Kinder.

Suggested Citation

  • Katharina Wrohlich, 2008. "Familie und Bildung in der Agenda 2010: Ziele, Maßnahmen und Wirkungen," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 77(1), pages 90-97.
    • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:77-1-7
    DOI: 10.3790/vjh.77.1.90
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.77.1.90
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3790/vjh.77.1.90?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miriam Beblo & Charlotte Lauer & Katharina Wrohlich, 2005. "Ganztagsschulen und Erwerbsbeteiligung von Müttern: eine Mikrosimulationsstudie für Deutschland," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 543, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Peter Haan & Michal Myck, 2007. "Apply with Caution: Introducing UK-Style In-Work Support in Germany," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 28(1), pages 43-72, March.
    3. Wolfgang Meister, 2006. "The child supplement for low-income earners – an example of deficient co-ordination in the German transfer system," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 59(16), pages 12-20, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Kurowska & Michal Myck & Katharina Wrohlich, 2012. "Family and Labor Market Choices: Requirements to Guide Effective Evidence-Based Policy," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1234, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Peter Haan & Viktor Steiner, 2008. "Making Work Pay for the Elderly Unemployed - Evaluating Alternative Policy Reforms for Germany," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 64(3), pages 380-402, September.
    3. Wolfgang Meister, 2009. "New child bonus, rent subsidy reform, higher Hartz-IV social benefit payments translate into clearly increased earnings for families in particular," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 62(16), pages 19-31, August.
    4. Wrohlich, Katharina, 2006. "Labor Supply and Child Care Choices in a Rationed Child Care Market," IZA Discussion Papers 2053, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. repec:nbp:journl:v:41:y:2010:i:3:p:5-34 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Olivier Bargain & Marco Caliendo & Peter Haan & Kristian Orsini, 2010. "“Making work pay” in a rationed labor market," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 23(1), pages 323-351, January.
    7. Mike Brewer & Marco Francesconi & Paul Gregg & Jeffrey Grogger, 2009. "Feature: In-work Benefit Reform in a Cross-National Perspective - Introduction," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(535), pages 1-14, February.
    8. Dovern, Jonas & Gern, Klaus-Jürgen & Meier, Carsten-Patrick & Oskamp, Frank & Sander, Birgit & Scheide, Joachim & Boss, Alfred, 2007. "Weltkonjunktur und deutsche Konjunktur im Herbst 2007," Kiel Discussion Papers 445/446, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    9. Michał Myck & Kajetan Trzciński, 2019. "From Partial to Full Universality: The Family 500+ Programme in Poland and its Labor Supply Implications," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 17(03), pages 36-44, October.
    10. Janina Nemitz, 2015. "The effect of all-day primary school programs on maternal labor supply," ECON - Working Papers 213, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    11. Richard Blundell & Mike Brewer & Peter Haan & Andrew Shephard, 2009. "Optimal Income Taxation of Lone Mothers: An Empirical Comparison of the UK and Germany," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(535), pages 101-121, February.
    12. Beninger, Denis & Bonin, Holger & Clauss, Markus & Horstschräer, Julia & Mühler, Grit, 2009. "Fiskalische Auswirkungen sowie arbeitsmarkt- und verteilungspolitische Effekte einer Einführung eines Betreuungsgeldes für Kinder unter 3 Jahren: Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums der Finanzen.," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 110517, September.
    13. Rolf Aaberge & Ugo Colombino, 2014. "Labour Supply Models," Contributions to Economic Analysis, in: Handbook of Microsimulation Modelling, volume 127, pages 167-221, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    14. Aaberge, Rolf & Flood, Lennart, 2013. "U.S. versus Sweden: The Effect of Alternative In-Work Tax Credit Policies on Labour Supply of Single Mothers," IZA Discussion Papers 7706, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Wolfgang Meister, 2011. "Reforms of Hartz IV, rent subsidies and wage deductions since January 2011: effects on the income of individual household types," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 64(09), pages 29-39, May.
    16. Boll, Christina & Lagemann, Andreas, 2017. "Public childcare and maternal labour supply: New evidence for Germany," HWWI Research Papers 180, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    17. Stefan Bach & Peter Haan & Richard Ochmann, 2013. "Taxation of Married Couples in Germany and the UK: One-Earner Couples Make the Difference," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 6(3), pages 3-24.
    18. Ludovica Gambaro & Jan Marcus & Frauke Peter, 2019. "School entry, afternoon care, and mothers’ labour supply," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 769-803, September.
    19. Boss, Alfred, 2007. "Wohin mit den Überschüssen der Bundesagentur für Arbeit?," Kiel Working Papers 1384, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    20. Eva M. Berger, 2009. "Maternal Employment and Happiness: The Effect of Non-Participation and Part-Time Employment on Mothers' Life Satisfaction," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 890, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    21. Anna Kurowska & Michał Myck & Katharina Wrohlich, 2017. "Making work pay: increasing labour supply of secondary earners in low income families with children," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 11(2), June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:77-1-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.