IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwvjh/73-30-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wäre die schweizerische "Schuldenbremse" ein geeignetes Instrument zur Disziplinierung der Fiskalpolitik in der EU?

Author

Listed:
  • Jochen Hartwig
  • Rita Kobel Rohr

Abstract

The stability and growth pact (SGP) has been criticised even before several EU Member States breached its rules. Countries belonging to a monetary union have an interest in keeping the budgetary behaviour of other Member States under control, since an unsustainable debt accumulation in one country would affect all of them (De Grauwe 2003: 2). However, the question arises whether there are not more appropriate rules than those codified in the SGP. This paper describes the mechanism of the"debt brake" applied in Switzerland, a rule alternative to the SGP aiming at limiting government debt levels. The transfer of a - modified - debt brake to the EU could solve or at least defuse some of the problems associated with the SGP, notably the asymmetry issue and the acknowledged incapability of the pact to adequately account for the current business cycle conditions in the Member States. Der Stabilitäts- und Wachstumspakt (SWP) steht nicht erst in der Kritik, seit immer mehr Länder Schwierigkeiten haben, seine Vorgaben zu erfüllen. Dennoch müssen Länder, die eine Währungsunion bilden, ein Interesse daran haben, ihr Finanzgebaren gegenseitig zu kontrollieren, da die Überschuldung eines Landes auf alle zurückfallen würde (vgl. De Grauwe 2003: 2). Die Frage ist, ob es geeignetere Regelungen gäbe als die im SWP kodifizierten. Dieser Beitrag beschreibt den Mechanismus der schweizerischen "Schuldenbremse", die eine alternative Regel zur Schuldenbegrenzung darstellt. Die Übertragung dieses Mechanismus auf die EU - wenn auch in modifizierter Form - könnte bestimmte Probleme, die bei der Handhabung des SWP aufgetreten sind - wie insbesondere die asymmetrische Ausgestaltung sowie mangelnde Konjunkturgerechtigkeit -, lösen bzw. entschärfen.

Suggested Citation

  • Jochen Hartwig & Rita Kobel Rohr, 2004. "Wäre die schweizerische "Schuldenbremse" ein geeignetes Instrument zur Disziplinierung der Fiskalpolitik in der EU?," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 73(3), pages 481-490.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:73-30-13
    DOI: 10.3790/vjh.73.3.481
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.73.3.481
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3790/vjh.73.3.481?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buti, Marco, 2003. "Revisiting the stability and growth pact: grand design or internal adjustment?," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 34908, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    2. Marco Buti & Sylvester Eijffinger & Daniele Franco, 2003. "Revisiting the Stability and Growth Pact: grand design or internal adjustment?," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 180, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michele Salvi & Christoph A. Schaltegger & Lukas Schmid, 2020. "Fiscal Rules Cause Lower Debt: Evidence from Switzerland’s Federal Debt Containment Rule," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(4), pages 605-642, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Truger, Achim & Hein, Eckhard, 2004. "Macroeconomic co-ordination as an economic policy concept : opportunities and obstacles in the EMU," WSI Working Papers 125, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    2. Pierre Richard Agénor & Devrim Yilmaz, 2006. "The Tyranny of Rules: Fiscal Discipline, Productive Spending, and Growth," Economics Discussion Paper Series 0616, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    3. Patrick Leblond, 2006. "The Political Stability and Growth Pact is Dead: Long Live the Economic Stability and Growth Pact," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44, pages 969-990, December.
    4. Iancu, Aurel & Olteanu, Dan, 2015. "Fiscal Consolidation by Austerity and EU Surveillance Policies," Working Papers of National Institute for Economic Research 151209, Institutul National de Cercetari Economice (INCE).
    5. Francesco Saraceno & Paola Monperrus-Veroni, 2004. "A Simple Proposal for a "Debt-Sensitive Stability Pact"," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 73(3), pages 471-480.
    6. Marco Buti, 2006. "Will the new stability and growth pact succeed? An economic and political perspective," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 241, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    7. Muscatelli, Vito A. & Natale, Piergiovanna & Tirelli, Patrizio, 2012. "A simple and flexible alternative to Stability and Growth Pact deficit ceilings. Is it at hand?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 14-26.
    8. Jacques Pelkmans, 2006. "Testing for Subsidiarity," Bruges European Economic Policy Briefings 13, European Economic Studies Department, College of Europe.
    9. Martin Larch & João Nogueira Martins, 2007. "Fiscal indicators - Proceedings of the the Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs Workshop held on 22 September 2006 in Brussels," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 297, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    10. Milesi-Ferretti, Gian Maria & Moriyama, Kenji, 2006. "Fiscal adjustment in EU countries: A balance sheet approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(12), pages 3281-3298, December.
    11. Jakob de Haan & Helge Berger & David-Jan Jansen & Jakob de Haan, 2003. "The End of the Stability and Growth Pact?," CESifo Working Paper Series 1093, CESifo.
    12. Lars P. Feld & Gebhard Kirchgassner, 2006. "On the Effectiveness of Debt Brakes: The Swiss Experience," CREMA Working Paper Series 2006-21, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    13. Matteo Luciani, 2004. "A VAR Model for the Analysis of the Effects of Monetary Policy in the Euro Area," Rivista di Politica Economica, SIPI Spa, vol. 94(6), pages 175-214, November-.
    14. Pierfederico Asdrubali & Soyoung Kim, 2008. "The Economic Effects of the EU Budget: A VAR Analysis," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(5), pages 933-968, December.
    15. Fernando C. Ballabriga & Carlos Martinez-Mongay, 2005. "Sustainability of EU public finances," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 225, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    16. Christian Saint-Etienne, 2005. "Finances publiques européennes : une réforme politiquement acceptable du Pacte de stabilité et de croissance," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 79(2), pages 333-348.
    17. Francesco Saraceno & Paola Veroni, 2005. "Reform of the Stability and Growth Pact: Reducing or Increasing the Nuisance," Sciences Po publications 2005-1, Sciences Po.
    18. Heikki Oksanen, 2003. "Population ageing and public finance targets," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 196, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    19. Szapáry, György & Orbán, Gábor, 2004. "A stabilitási és növekedési paktum az új tagállamok szemszögéből [The Stabilization and Growth Pact in the light of the new EU member-states]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 810-831.
    20. Maria Dunin-Wasowicz, 2004. "Economic and Monetary Union in the Accession Countries - Political and Economic Contexts," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2004(2), pages 99-114.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:73-30-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.