IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/netsci/v9y2021i2p213-235_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The roles actors play in policy networks: Central positions in strongly institutionalized fields

Author

Listed:
  • Ingold, Karin
  • Fischer, Manuel
  • Christopoulos, Dimitris

Abstract

Centralities are a widely studied phenomenon in network science. In policy networks, central actors are of interest because they are assumed to control information flows, to link opposing coalitions and to directly impact decision-making. First, we study what type of actor (e.g., state authorities or interest groups) is able to occupy central positions in the highly institutionalized context of policy networks. Second, we then ask whether bonding or bridging centralities prove to be more stable over time. Third, we investigate how these types of centrality influence actors’ positions in a network over time. We therefore adopt a longitudinal perspective and run exponential random graph models, including lagged central network positions at t1 as the main independent variable for actors’ activity and popularity at t2. Results confirm that very few actors are able to maintain central positions over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Ingold, Karin & Fischer, Manuel & Christopoulos, Dimitris, 2021. "The roles actors play in policy networks: Central positions in strongly institutionalized fields," Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 213-235, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:213-235_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2050124221000011/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christopher Walker & Alex Moulis, 2022. "Understanding policy transfer through social network analysis: expanding methodologies with an intensive case study approach," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(4), pages 693-713, December.
    2. Kotkaniemi, Anniina & Ylä-Anttila, Tuomas & Chen, Ted Hsuan Yun, 2023. "Policy Influence and Influencers Online and Off," SocArXiv dnrg6, Center for Open Science.
    3. Nils C. Bandelow & Johanna Hornung, 2022. "How communities and policy instruments govern sustainability," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(5), pages 538-540, September.
    4. Alessandra Rigo & Elena Andriollo & Elena Pisani, 2022. "Intermediary Organizations in Nature Conservation Initiatives: The Case of the EU-Funded LIFE Programme," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-28, June.
    5. Carla Inguaggiato & Michele Graziano Ceddia & Maurice Tschopp & Dimitris Christopoulos, 2021. "Codifying and Commodifying Nature: Narratives on Forest Property Rights and the Implementation of Tenure Regularization Policies in Northwestern Argentina," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:213-235_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/nws .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.