IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jwecon/v19y2024i1p19-40_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors influencing wine ratings in an online wine community: The case of Trentino–Alto Adige

Author

Listed:
  • Gastaldello, Giulia
  • Schäufele-Elbers, Isabel
  • Schamel, Günter

Abstract

Consumers often struggle to make their choice in the highly diversified wine market. With wine being an experience good, consumers must rely on extrinsic characteristics, e.g., information on the label. Thus, easily available quality signals like consumer ratings have become an increasingly useful and widespread tool. Vivino is one of the largest online wine communities with over 60 million users, which have more than doubled since 2018. Hence, users have easy access to peer ratings, while established wine expert ratings are being challenged. This study analyzes data from Vivino to explore factors affecting consumer ratings at different price points, considering several wine attributes like geographical indications, brand, and the so-called “community effect.” We show that there is a small but significant community effect on wine's perceived quality related to its popularity among users of the Vivino community, as well as effects from specific wine attributes. Moreover, we estimate a hedonic quantile model on similar price ranges to compare the effect of the same regressors on wine prices. Results contribute to a better understanding of how different factors affect consumers’ wine evaluations, allowing to compare their effect on the “pure” consumer preference (i.e., consumer ratings) and market value.

Suggested Citation

  • Gastaldello, Giulia & Schäufele-Elbers, Isabel & Schamel, Günter, 2024. "Factors influencing wine ratings in an online wine community: The case of Trentino–Alto Adige," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 19-40, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jwecon:v:19:y:2024:i:1:p:19-40_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1931436124000026/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jwecon:v:19:y:2024:i:1:p:19-40_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jwe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.