IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/etheor/v34y2018i02p253-276_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Panel Anderson-Hsiao Estimation With Roots Near Unity

Author

Listed:
  • PHILLIPS, PETER C. B.

Abstract

Limit theory is developed for the dynamic panel IV estimator in the presence of an autoregressive root near unity. In the unit root case, Anderson–Hsiao lagged variable instruments satisfy orthogonality conditions but are well known to be irrelevant. For a fixed time series sample size (T) IV is inconsistent and approaches a shifted Cauchy-distributed random variate as the cross-section sample size n → ∞. But when T → ∞, either for fixed n or as n → ∞, IV is $\sqrt T$ consistent and its limit distribution is a ratio of random variables that converges to twice a standard Cauchy as n → ∞. In this case, the usual instruments are uncorrelated with the regressor but irrelevance does not prevent consistent estimation. The same Cauchy limit theory holds sequentially and jointly as (n, T) → ∞ with no restriction on the divergence rates of n and T. When the common autoregressive root $\rho = 1 + c/\sqrt T$ the panel comprises a collection of mildly integrated time series. In this case, the IV estimator is $\sqrt n$ consistent for fixed T and $\sqrt {nT}$ consistent with limit distribution N (0, 4) when (n, T) → ∞ sequentially or jointly. These results are robust for common roots of the form ρ = 1+c/Tγ for all γ ∈ (0, 1) and joint convergence holds. Limit normality holds but the variance changes when γ = 1. When γ > 1 joint convergence fails and sequential limits differ with different rates of convergence. These findings reveal the fragility of conventional Gaussian IV asymptotics to persistence in dynamic panel regressions.

Suggested Citation

  • Phillips, Peter C. B., 2018. "Dynamic Panel Anderson-Hsiao Estimation With Roots Near Unity," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(2), pages 253-276, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:34:y:2018:i:02:p:253-276_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266466615000298/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yanbo Liu & Peter C. B. Phillips & Jun Yu, 2023. "A Panel Clustering Approach To Analyzing Bubble Behavior," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 64(4), pages 1347-1395, November.
    2. Mayer, Alexander, 2022. "On the local power of some tests of strict exogeneity in linear fixed effects models," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 49-74.
    3. Peter C. B. Phillips, 2020. "Dynamic Panel Modeling of Climate Change," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-28, July.
    4. Norkutė, Milda & Westerlund, Joakim, 2021. "The factor analytical approach in near unit root interactive effects panels," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 569-590.
    5. John C. Chao & Peter C. B. Phillips, 2019. "Uniform Inference in Panel Autoregression," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-28, November.
    6. Bun, Maurice J.G. & Kleibergen, Frank, 2022. "Identification Robust Inference For Moments-Based Analysis Of Linear Dynamic Panel Data Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(4), pages 689-751, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:34:y:2018:i:02:p:253-276_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ect .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.