IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000093/008999.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pensando con Bourdieu contra Bourdieu: una crítica metodológica del mercado linguístico

Author

Listed:
  • Andrés Cendales

Abstract

Con base en la metodología de la lógica situacional que Popper (1997) formula para las cienciassociales, este artículo discute la consistencia metodológica con la cual Bourdieu (2000) usa lanoción de mercado linguístico en el análisis sociológico sobre el discurso. Se muestra la existenciade dos nociones de racionalidad económica, de tal manera que, los agentes de decisión, al mismotiempo actúan con una dotación de racionalidad sustantiva y otra de racionalidad acotada.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrés Cendales, 2011. "Pensando con Bourdieu contra Bourdieu: una crítica metodológica del mercado linguístico," Revista Cuadernos de Economia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000093:008999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.fce.unal.edu.co/media/files/documentos/Cuadernos/54/v30n54a09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    mercado lingüístico; racionalidad sustantiva; racionalidad acotada; principio deracionalidad; convenciones.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • B41 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology - - - Economic Methodology
    • D03 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000093:008999. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Facultad de Ciencias Economicas Unal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/funalco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.