IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmj/networ/y2023i22p103-118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency of nursing-homes in Israel: A comparison between private, non-profit and governmental nursing-homes

Author

Listed:
  • Jaudat KHALAILY

    (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

This article explores the satisfaction of elderlies from their nursing home (NH), while examining how the type of the NH (private, governmental, or associational) and the funding of an elderly (private or public) affects the efficiency of NHs and consequently its impact on elderlies' satisfaction from their NHs. The research confirms that governmental nursing homes are less efficient, and consequently elderlies feel less satisfied from their care than private and associational ones. Another explanation for the high satisfaction from the private and associational nursing homes is that elderlies in an NH prefer to receive large rooms, good quality food, and quick response from the nursing home staff. These services are less available in governmental nursing homes, where the ratio of elderlies to one staff is higher than in non-profit and private NHs. The rate of satisfaction regarding the associational nursing homes are found in the middle between the other two. These associational nursing homes scored higher on satisfaction than the governmental, but less than the private ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaudat KHALAILY, 2023. "Efficiency of nursing-homes in Israel: A comparison between private, non-profit and governmental nursing-homes," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 22, pages 103-118, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cmj:networ:y:2023:i:22:p:103-118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/NIS_22_2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:networ:y:2023:i:22:p:103-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serghie Dan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://seaopenresearch.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.