IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/clh/resear/v16y2023i32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community Engagement in Local Communities: Hearing the Voices of the Public

Author

Listed:
  • Kimberly Jones

    (University of Calgary)

Abstract

Representative democracy is no longer enough for day-to-day governance as citizens demand more of their elected officials’ time and more attention paid to matters that concern them . Public hearings, open houses and other traditional means of engaging with citizens, especially at the municipal level, are not sufficient for true participatory democracy . Nor is going to the polls on a set date enough to satisfy citizens’ desires to interact more with elected officials . Done properly, engaging with the community can enable politicians to make better decisions . It can also broaden their perspectives on issues, offer opportunities for better communication and relationship-building with a diverse public and allow new ideas to come into play in the decision- making process . Although an Ipsos poll has revealed that just 20 per cent of Canadians have ever engaged in community engagement, those who did said they saw it as a positive experience . This paper examines the barriers to community engagement, including failure to reach people, time and place limitations, NIMBYism and the problem of strong voices dominating and making other people feel unheard . The City of Nanaimo offers a successful model of community engagement . When preparing an Affordable Housing Strategy, officials reached out to the public through pop-up events, workshops, surveys and one-on-one conversations . Follow-up included a white paper that incorporated the engagement process, public feedback and policy options . Later, a draft of the strategy was presented to the public during an open house which offered a question-and- answer period . Engaging with the public is not a small undertaking . However, this paper shows that problems such as divergent opinions, strongly vocal activists potentially hijacking the agenda, inevitable conflicts between factions and establishing the best times and places for engagement are not insurmountable . This paper offers recommendations for community engagement that can be adapted by both large and small municipalities . The key to successful engagement is advance preparation, including deciding which projects are best suited for this approach, public communication to ensure as many people as possible know about the opportunity to engage and starting the engagement process early . Taking the process to the people by going to popular local hang-outs and talking to citizens there helps mitigate the problem of inconvenient times and structured settings for many people . In smaller municipalities, officials can set up tables on Main Street, at libraries or local clubs . Combining online engagement with other efforts could help bring together ideas and perspectives from those more likely to engage online and those who prefer traditional methods of engagement, which will help to improve the quality of the whole process . Online engagement can supplement in-person connections and can help to set out rules around behaviour and enforcement of them . Municipalities can also partner with translators and cultural organizations to ensure that no one is left out of the process because of language or other barriers . Feedback and follow-up are two important parts of the engagement process as well . Citizens need to know that their input was valuable in determining final policies .

Suggested Citation

  • Kimberly Jones, 2023. "Community Engagement in Local Communities: Hearing the Voices of the Public," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 16(32), October.
  • Handle: RePEc:clh:resear:v:16:y:2023:i:32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/AUMA-UP42-ResPapr-CommEngageLocalComm.Jones_.Oct11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ank Michels & Laurens De Graaf, 2017. "Examining citizen participation: local participatory policymaking and democracy revisited," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(6), pages 875-881, November.
    2. Greg Brown & Sean Yeong Wei Chin, 2013. "Assessing the Effectiveness of Public Participation in Neighbourhood Planning," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 563-588, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francis Marleau Donais & Irène Abi-Zeid & E. Owen D. Waygood & Roxane Lavoie, 2021. "A Framework for Post-Project Evaluation of Multicriteria Decision Aiding Processes from the Stakeholders’ Perspective: Design and Application," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1161-1191, October.
    2. Sergey Revyakin, 2018. "On the Effectiveness of Electronic Platforms of Citizen Participation in Public Administration," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 94-113.
    3. José María Moreno-Jiménez & Cristina Pérez-Espés & Pilar Rivera-Torres, 2020. "Relevant Aspects for an EF3-Evaluation of E-Cognocracy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Beni Rohrbach & Sharolyn Anderson & Patrick Laube, 2016. "The effects of sample size on data quality in participatory mapping of past land use," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(4), pages 681-697, July.
    5. Aubert, Alice H. & Esculier, Fabien & Lienert, Judit, 2020. "Recommendations for online elicitation of swing weights from citizens in environmental decision-making," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    6. Cornelius O. Okorie & Francisca N. Ogba & Harrison O. Iwuala & Christopher Arua & Nwankwo Felix & Victor C. Nwosumba, 2022. "Decentralization of South Eastern Nigeria’s Local Governments and Achievement of Mandates Enshrined in Nigeria’s 1999 Constitution," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    7. Ertiö, Titiana-Petra & Bhagwatwar, Akshay, 2017. "Citizens as planners: Harnessing information and values from the bottom-up," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 111-113.
    8. Marina Van Geenhuizen & Razieh Nejabat, 2021. "Municipalities’ Policy on Innovation and Market Introduction in Sustainable Energy: A Focus on Local Young Technology Firms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Kantola, Sini & Fagerholm, Nora & Nikula, Ari, 2023. "Utilization and implementation of PPGIS in land use planning and decision-making from the perspective of organizations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    10. Devindi Geekiyanage & Terrence Fernando & Kaushal Keraminiyage, 2021. "Mapping Participatory Methods in the Urban Development Process: A Systematic Review and Case-Based Evidence Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    11. Ревякин С. А., 2018. "Об Эффективности Электронных Платформ Участия Граждан В Государственном Управлении," Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления // Public administration issues, НИУ ВШЭ, issue 2, pages 94-113.
    12. Cristina Ampatzidou & Katharina Gugerell & Teodora Constantinescu & Oswald Devisch & Martina Jauschneg & Martin Berger, 2018. "All Work and No Play? Facilitating Serious Games and Gamified Applications in Participatory Urban Planning and Governance," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 34-46.
    13. Steven Koop & Fabian Monteiro Gomes & Laura Schoot & Carel Dieperink & Peter Driessen & Kees Van Leeuwen, 2018. "Assessing the Capacity to Govern Flood Risk in Cities and the Role of Contextual Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Yanliu Lin & Stijn Kant, 2021. "Using Social Media for Citizen Participation: Contexts, Empowerment, and Inclusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    15. Ingemar Elander & Eva Gustavsson, 2019. "From policy community to issue networks: Implementing social sustainability in a Swedish urban development programme," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(6), pages 1082-1101, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:clh:resear:v:16:y:2023:i:32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bev Dahlby (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/spcalca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.