IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cdh/commen/466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Government Intervention in Venture Capital in Canada: Toward Greater Transparency and Accountability

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Remillard

    (Remillard Consulting Group)

Abstract

This study asesses government venture capital policy in Canada, providing for the first time an overview of policies and how they have evolved over time. The purpose of the study is three-fold: (i) to demonstrate that governments at the federal and provincial levels are extensively involved in venture capital; (ii) to examine the reasons behind this activity and the consequences that flow from the plethora of agencies, programs and tax incentives that have mushroomed over the years; and (iii) to recommend ways in which government might better organize its approach to handling the venture capital file. Undergirding the study is the conviction that getting venture capital policy right is a vital task for all governments that pursue a successful innovation agenda. Improving the quality of venture capital policy will provide a win-win outcome for the wider public, government and even the venture capital industry itself. The breadth and depth of governments’ venture capital initiatives are not fully appreciated by either the general public, the media or legislatures. This inattention stems from the very nature of governments’ approaches to venture capital wherein policy is multi-faceted and relatively hidden from scrutiny, involving as it does, units within Crown corporations, programs managed by private-sector third parties and tax credits for retail investors. The study provides a comprehensive suite of actionable recommendations that, if adopted, will better position Canada to take advantage of the technological revolution that is underway throughout the economy. Those recommendations include: • Taking the steps necessary to improve accountability, transparency and reporting of government activities in the venture capital arena, including a mandated 10-year policy and programs review. Venture capital policy in Canada displays two central characteristics that need to be addressed: there is a certain policy stickiness, with policy tools remaining in place for decades, coupled with policy experimentation, with governments trying various techniques to improve the flow of capital to innovative firms. • Establishing a more robust analytical framework for understanding the dynamics of venture capital by forming a national public-private Venture Capital Research Institute. • Ensuring a better handoff of investments by venture capital funds into the portfolios of private-equity or buyout funds. • Improving the social contract with the venture capital industry by instituting measures to enhance professional development in the industry and by encouraging the industry to adopt international best practices standards for responsible investing. • Developing a formal federal-provincial coordinating mechanism to ensure that governments across the country don’t act at cross-purposes to one another. Finally, the study looks ahead to the emerging public policy challenges facing government venture capital programs as a result of developing trends within and without the industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Remillard, 2017. "Government Intervention in Venture Capital in Canada: Toward Greater Transparency and Accountability," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 466, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdh:commen:466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cdhowe.org/sites/default/files/attachments/research_papers/mixed/Commentary_466.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Public Governance and Accountability;

    JEL classification:

    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdh:commen:466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kristine Gray (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cdhowca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.