IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/but/manage/v30y2019i1p114-119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key leadership qualities for major science events. The case of SCIKIDS Science Festival

Author

Listed:
  • Andreea-Mihaela Stoica

    (Faculty of Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Mihaela Ionită

    (Faculty of Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

The paper describe leadership qualities identified as important by stakeholders of a major science event. Can leadership skills raise a major science event for the community? What are the qualities needed to develop such an event that aims to become a tradition in a unfriendly society as the romanian society? Financial skills, credibility and communication are just a few of the leadership issues identified as important in successfully implementing a major scientific event. SCIKIDS Science Festival, is the largest youth science festival in Romania, celebrating 7 editions. The inaugural event was held on October 2013. In 2019 SCIKIDS Science Festival celebrated seven edition accumulating over 50.000 visitors.This study is based on findings from seven years of practice in science events area.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreea-Mihaela Stoica & Mihaela Ionită, 2019. "Key leadership qualities for major science events. The case of SCIKIDS Science Festival," Manager Journal, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 30(1), pages 114-119, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:but:manage:v:30:y:2019:i:1:p:114-119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://manager.faa.ro/download/1021_30_m_114_119.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://manager.faa.ro/en/article/Key-leadership-qualities-for-major-science-events-The-case-of-SCIKIDS-Science-Festival~1021.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric Jensen, 2011. "Evaluate impact of communication," Nature, Nature, vol. 469(7329), pages 162-162, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:but:manage:v:30:y:2019:i:1:p:114-119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cosmin Catalin Olteanu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/faaubro.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.