IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/brc/brccej/v3y2018i3p134-138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The "Techno-Stress" Phenomenon - Measures To Prevent It In Modern Organisation

Author

Listed:
  • Constanta POPESCU

    (”Valahia” University of Târgoviste, Romania)

  • Oana-Mihaela ILIE

    (”Valahia” University of Târgoviste, Romania)

  • Georgiana Tatiana BONDAC

    (”Valahia” University of Târgoviste, Romania)

Abstract

The use of new information and communication technologies (NICT) as a working tool has a particular impact on modern organizations. Although technology itself is "neutral", it can also generate negative consequences for NICT users who may suffer the so-called "techno-stress." The concept and hence the extent of this phenomenon have varied over time. In this sense, the objective of this study is twofold. First of all, we propose to analyze the phenomenon of "techno-stress" (or the psychosocial stress associated with the use of new technologies), which are the main changes in the workforce associated with the use of new technologies that affect the psychosocial health of employees which organizational and individual factors modulate these relationships. Secondly, we intend to explore the main strategies for preventing and minimizing techno-stress in order to ensure professional performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Constanta POPESCU & Oana-Mihaela ILIE & Georgiana Tatiana BONDAC, 2018. "The "Techno-Stress" Phenomenon - Measures To Prevent It In Modern Organisation," Contemporary Economy Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 3(3), pages 134-138.
    • Handle: RePEc:brc:brccej:v:3:y:2018:i:3:p:134-138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revec.ro/papers/180316.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T. S. Ragu-Nathan & Monideepa Tarafdar & Bhanu S. Ragu-Nathan & Qiang Tu, 2008. "The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 417-433, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Constanta POPESCU & Georgiana –Tatiana BONDAC & Oana-Mihaela ILIE, 2019. "Stress Generated By The Digital Environment," Contemporary Economy Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 4(1), pages 74-77.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. René Riedl & Harald Kindermann & Andreas Auinger & Andrija Javor, 2012. "Technostress from a Neurobiological Perspective," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 4(2), pages 61-69, April.
    2. Louisa Scheepers & Peter Angerer & Nico Dragano, 2022. "Digitalisation in Craft Enterprises: Perceived Technostress, Readiness for Prevention and Countermeasures—A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Woo Jin Lee & Inho Hwang, 2021. "Sustainable Information Security Behavior Management: An Empirical Approach for the Causes of Employees’ Voice Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.
    4. Jin P. Gerlach & Ronald T. Cenfetelli, 2022. "Overcoming the Single-IS Paradigm in Individual-Level IS Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 476-488, June.
    5. Marc T. P. Adam & Henner Gimpel & Alexander Maedche & René Riedl, 2017. "Design Blueprint for Stress-Sensitive Adaptive Enterprise Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(4), pages 277-291, August.
    6. Lisa Braunheim & Daniëlle Otten & Christoph Kasinger & Elmar Brähler & Manfred E. Beutel, 2022. "Individual and Work-Related Predictors of Exhaustion in East and West Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-11, September.
    7. Reetta Oksa & Tiina Saari & Markus Kaakinen & Atte Oksanen, 2021. "The Motivations for and Well-Being Implications of Social Media Use at Work among Millennials and Members of Former Generations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-22, January.
    8. Peng, Zeyu & Sun, Yongqiang & Guo, Xitong, 2018. "Antecedents of employees’ extended use of enterprise systems: An integrative view of person, environment, and technology," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 104-120.
    9. Constanţa POPESCU & Oana Mihaela ILIE & Georgiana Tatiana BONDAC, 2018. "The "Techno-stress" Phenomenon and Its Consequences in the Modern Organization," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Tomita CIULEI & Gabriel GORGHIU (ed.), CATES 2017, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 22, pages 224-238, Editura Lumen.
    10. Elisabeth Rohwer & Joelle-Cathrin Flöther & Volker Harth & Stefanie Mache, 2022. "Overcoming the “Dark Side” of Technology—A Scoping Review on Preventing and Coping with Work-Related Technostress," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-30, March.
    11. Yi Sun & Shihui Li & Lingling Yu, 2022. "The dark sides of AI personal assistant: effects of service failure on user continuance intention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 17-39, March.
    12. Francesco Pace & Giulia Sciotto & Naomi Alexia Randazzo & Vincenza Macaluso, 2022. "Teachers’ Work-Related Well-Being in Times of COVID-19: The Effects of Technostress and Online Teaching," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-10, October.
    13. Danilo M. Marchiori & Emerson W. Mainardes & Ricardo G. Rodrigues, 2018. "Validation of the ISS-QUAL and the role of gender, age and education on it service quality in the public sector," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 217-230, December.
    14. You-Kyung Lee, 2021. "Impacts of Digital Technostress and Digital Technology Self-Efficacy on Fintech Usage Intention of Chinese Gen Z Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    15. Iina Savolainen & Reetta Oksa & Nina Savela & Magdalena Celuch & Atte Oksanen, 2021. "COVID-19 Anxiety—A Longitudinal Survey Study of Psychological and Situational Risks among Finnish Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-13, January.
    16. Matteo Curcuruto & Sian Williams & Margherita Brondino & Andrea Bazzoli, 2023. "Investigating the Impact of Occupational Technostress and Psychological Restorativeness of Natural Spaces on Work Engagement and Work–Life Balance Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-13, January.
    17. Aurora Murgea, 2023. "The Dark Side of Digitalisation: Wealthier but Unhappier," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 326-334, December.
    18. Shanshan Zhang & Fengchun Huang & Yuting Zhang & Qiwen Li, 2023. "A Person-Environment Fit Model to Explain Information and Communication Technologies-Enabled After-Hours Work-Related Interruptions in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.
    19. Sadia Shakeel & Muhammad Majid Khan & Rao Aamir Ali Khan & Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, 2022. "Linking Personality Traits, Self-Efficacy and Burnout of Teachers in Public Schools: Does School Climate Play a Moderating Role?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 19-39, March.
    20. Carla Estrada-Muñoz & Dante Castillo & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Joan Boada-Grau, 2020. "Teacher Technostress in the Chilean School System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-17, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    NICT; techno-stress; techno-anxiety; techno-fatigue; techno-addiction; technophobia;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:brc:brccej:v:3:y:2018:i:3:p:134-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristina GANESCU (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.univcb.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.