IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ajlecn/v15y2024i2p167-208n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Do Judges Want? How to Model Judicial Preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Cameron Charles M.

    (Princeton University, Princeton, USA)

  • Kornhauser Lewis A.

    (New York University School of Law, New York, USA)

Abstract

We discuss a central question in the study of courts: What do judges want? We suggest three different domains that might serve as the basic preferences of a judge: case dispositions and rules, caseloads and case mixes, and social consequences. We emphasize preferences over dispositions on the grounds of plausibility and tractability. We then identify desireable properties of dispositional utility functions and the relationship between dispositional utility and expected utility for rules. We examine the impact on expected rule utility from case distributions that are sensitive to the enforced rule. We illustrate how to combine dipositional utility with efforts costs and time constraints. We provide examples of case spaces, dispositional utility functions, and expected utility functions for enforced rules. This essay is an early draft of a chapter of a book-in-progress on the positive political theory of courts.

Suggested Citation

  • Cameron Charles M. & Kornhauser Lewis A., 2024. "What Do Judges Want? How to Model Judicial Preferences," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 15(2), pages 167-208, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:15:y:2024:i:2:p:167-208:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/ajle-2023-0142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ajle-2023-0142
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ajle-2023-0142?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ajlecn:v:15:y:2024:i:2:p:167-208:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.