IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bnu/journl/v10y2019i1p57-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation Of The Intensity Of Edible Mushrooms Contamination By Heavy Metals In The Conditions Of Right-Bank Forest-Steppe Of Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • S.F. Razanov
  • O.I. Vradiy

    (Vinnytsia National Agrarian University)

Abstract

The article is devoted to assessing the level of pollution of edible mushrooms by lead, cadmium, zinc and copper in the conditions of the Right Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Studies were carried out in the forest areas of the Vinnitsa and Kalinovsky districts of the Vinnitsa region. The study of the concentration of heavy metals was carried out in the scientific-measuring agrochemical laboratory of the department of ecology and environmental protection of the agronomical faculty on the basis of Vinnitsa National Agrarian University. The concentration of heavy metals in the fruit bodies of the fungi studied was determined by atomic absorption spectrometry after dry mineralization. Analysis of the anthropogenic impact on the environment shows that the intensity of contamination by heavy metals of all components of the environment in some areas is growing rapidly, to a certain extent leads to contamination of natural food raw materials with these toxins. According to the study revealed an excess of the maximum permissible concentrations of cadmium in Gyroporus cyanescens (Lat.) by 1.6 times, Laetiporus sulphureus (Lat.) — by 1.5 times, Boletus regius (Lat.) — by 1.4 times, Xerocomus (Lat.) — by 1.7 times, Russula (Lat.) — by 6.5 times, Boletus edulis (Lat.) — by 1.7 times, Amanita rubescens (Lat.) — by 1.5 times, Leccinum scabrum (Lat.) — by 1.7 times, Leccinum aurantiacum (Lat.) — by 1.3 times and Armillaria mellea (Lat.) — by 1.7 times, while the concentration of lead, zinc and copper was lower than MPC. At the same time, it should be noted that the highest concentration of lead was found in Armillaria mellea (Lat.) compared to Cantharellus cibarius (Lat.), Gyroporus cyanescens (Lat.), Laetiporus sulphureus (Lat.), Boletus regius (Lat.), Xerocomus (Lat.), Russula (Lat.), Boletus edulis (Lat.), Amanita rubescens (Lat.), Leccinum scabrum (Lat.) and Leccinum aurantiacum (Lat.) by 1.4, 1.3, 1.07, 1.2, 1.03, 1.4, 1.2, 1.07, 1.1 and 1.3 times, respectively. The concentration of cadmium was the highest in Russula (Lat.), in comparison with Cantharellus cibarius (Lat.), Gyroporus cyanescens (Lat.), Laetiporus sulphureus (Lat.), Boletus regius (Lat.), Xerocomus (Lat.), Boletus edulis (Lat.), Amanita rubescens (Lat.), Leccinum scabrum (Lat.), Leccinum aurantiacum (Lat.) and Armillaria mellea (Lat.) by 36, 1.4, 14.4, 15.4, 12.7, 12.7, 14.4, 12.7, 16.6 and 12.7 times, respectively. The concentration of zinc was the highest in Boletus edulis (Lat.), in comparison with Cantharellus cibarius (Lat.), Gyroporus cyanescens (Lat.), Laetiporus sulphureus (Lat.), Boletus regius (Lat.), Xerocomus (Lat.), Russula (Lat.), Amanita rubescens (Lat.), Leccinum scabrum (Lat.), Leccinum aurantiacum (Lat.) and Armillaria mellea (Lat.) by 1.7, 1.6, 2.3, 1.03, 1.5, 1.02, 1.7, 2.7, 1.1 and 154 times, respectively. The concentration of copper was the highest in Armillaria mellea (Lat.), in comparison with Cantharellus cibarius (Lat.), Gyroporus cyanescens (Lat.), Laetiporus sulphureus (Lat.), Boletus regius (Lat.), Xerocomus (Lat.), Russula (Lat.), Boletus edulis (Lat.), Amanita rubescens (Lat.), Leccinum scabrum (Lat.) and Leccinum aurantiacum (Lat.) by 8.7, 4.4, 46.6, 15.5, 11.2, 4.4, 10.8, 17.5, 4 and 20 times, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • S.F. Razanov & O.I. Vradiy, 2019. "Evaluation Of The Intensity Of Edible Mushrooms Contamination By Heavy Metals In The Conditions Of Right-Bank Forest-Steppe Of Ukraine," Balanced Nature Using, Institute of agroecology and environmental management, vol. 10(1), pages 57-66, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bnu:journl:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:57-66
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://natureus.org.ua/repec/archive/1_2019/7.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bnu:journl:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:57-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Olexii Shkuratov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaeemua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.