IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/blg/journl/v17y2022i3p5-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Synergy Between Digitalization And The Level Of Research And Business Development Allocations At Eu Level

Author

Listed:
  • AIVAZ Kamer-Ainur

    ("Ovidius" University of Constanta, Romania)

  • TOFAN Ionela

    ("Al. Ioan Cuza" University of Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

In an era in which technological progress is creating new economic perspectives, exploring interdependencies and finding the dimension of the connection between ICT skills and the R&D dimension are of particular interest. It is somewhat universally accepted that ICT development actively helps the growth of R&D potential in a general sense and that innovation stimulates new developments in the ICT sphere. This study suggests a statistical measuring of this connection and it identifies a quantifiable corellation between R&D allocations and the increase of computer and Internet use at companies’ level. The econometric analysis of the available data at European countries’ level over the 2012-2021 period was performed using the panel method, which allowed the estimation of a regression relationship between the chosen indicators. The identified connection is one of direct proportionality between increased R&D allocations and increased digitalization and ICT skills in businesses.

Suggested Citation

  • AIVAZ Kamer-Ainur & TOFAN Ionela, 2022. "The Synergy Between Digitalization And The Level Of Research And Business Development Allocations At Eu Level," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 17(3), pages 5-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:blg:journl:v:17:y:2022:i:3:p:5-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://magazines.ulbsibiu.ro/eccsf/RePEc/blg/journl/17301aivaz.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Denise A. Jones, 2007. "Voluntary Disclosure in R&D†Intensive Industries," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 489-522, June.
    2. Blazsek, Szabolcs & Escribano, Alvaro, 2016. "Patent propensity, R&D and market competition: Dynamic spillovers of innovation leaders and followers," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 191(1), pages 145-163.
    3. Rus Mircea-Iosif, 2013. ""The Knowledge Triangle" In A Knowledge-Based Society," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 942-947, July.
    4. Arundel, Anthony & Kabla, Isabelle, 1998. "What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 127-141, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Chao & Gu, Junjian & Luo, Rongxi, 2022. "Corporate innovation and R&D expenditure disclosures," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    2. Andreas Reinstaller & Gerhard Schwarz, 2012. "Die wirtschafts- und forschungspolitische Bedeutung der Umsetzung der Biopatentrichtlinie im österreichischen Patentgesetz," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 44635, February.
    3. Collinson S. & Narula, R., 2014. "Asset recombination in international partnerships as a source of improved innovation capabilities in China," MERIT Working Papers 2014-061, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    4. Buesa, Mikel & Heijs, Joost & Baumert, Thomas, 2010. "The determinants of regional innovation in Europe: A combined factorial and regression knowledge production function approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 722-735, July.
    5. Crass, Dirk & Garcia Valero, Francisco & Pitton, Francesco & Rammer, Christian, 2016. "Protecting innovation through patents and trade secrets: Determinants and performance impacts for firms with a single innovation," ZEW Discussion Papers 16-061, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    6. Katia Angue & Cécile Ayerbe & Liliana Mitkova, 2014. "A method using two dimensions of the patent classification for measuring the technological proximity: an application in identifying a potential R&D partner in biotechnology," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 39(5), pages 716-747, October.
    7. Blazsek, Szabolcs & Escribano, Alvaro, 2023. "Score-driven threshold ice-age models: Benchmark models for long-run climate forecasts," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    8. Tom Broekel & Matthias Brachert & Matthias Duschl & Thomas Brenner, 2015. "Joint R and D subsidies, related variety, and regional innovation," Working Papers on Innovation and Space 2015-01, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    9. Hwang, Hong & Peng, Cheng-Hau & Shih, Pei-Cyuan, 2014. "Parallel imports, product innovation and market structures," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 237-245.
    10. Rajeev K. Goel, 2023. "Seek foreign funds or technology? Relative impacts of different spillover modes on innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1466-1488, August.
    11. Bradley, Wendy A. & Kolev, Julian, 2023. "How does digital piracy affect innovation? Evidence from software firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(3).
    12. Fontana, Roberto & Nuvolari, Alessandro & Shimizu, Hiroshi & Vezzulli, Andrea, 2013. "Reassessing patent propensity: Evidence from a dataset of R&D awards, 1977–2004," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 1780-1792.
    13. Mario Corona & Youngjung Geum & Sungjoo Lee, 2017. "Patterns of Protecting Both Technological and Nontechnological Innovation for Service Offerings: Case of the Video-Game Industry," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 192-204, September.
    14. Malte Mosel, 2011. "Big patents, small secrets: how firms protect inventions when R&D outcome is heterogeneous," Working Papers 105, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).
    15. Sternitzke, Christian, 2013. "An exploratory analysis of patent fencing in pharmaceuticals: The case of PDE5 inhibitors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 542-551.
    16. Battke, Benedikt & Schmidt, Tobias S. & Stollenwerk, Stephan & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2016. "Internal or external spillovers—Which kind of knowledge is more likely to flow within or across technologies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 27-41.
    17. Horst Feldmann, 2013. "Technological unemployment in industrial countries," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 1099-1126, November.
    18. Titze, Mirko & Brachert, Matthias & Kubis, Alexander, 2010. "The Identification of Industrial Clusters – Methodical Aspects in a Multidimensional Framework for Cluster Identification," IWH Discussion Papers 14/2010, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    19. Barankay, Iwan & Contigiani, Andrea & Hsu, David, 2018. "Trade Secrets and Innovation: Evidence from the “Inevitable Disclosure†Doctrine," CEPR Discussion Papers 13077, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Hyojeong Lim & Yongtae Park, 2010. "Identification of technological knowledge intermediaries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(3), pages 543-561, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:blg:journl:v:17:y:2022:i:3:p:5-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mihaela Herciu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feulbro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.