IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v75y2021i1p24-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maximum likelihood estimation based on the Laplace approximation for p2 network regression models

Author

Listed:
  • Ruggero Bellio
  • Nicola Soriani

Abstract

The class of p2 models is suitable for modeling binary relation data in social network analysis. A p2 model is essentially a regression model for bivariate binary responses, featuring within‐dyad dependence and correlated crossed random effects to represent heterogeneity of actors. Despite some desirable properties, these models are used less frequently in empirical applications than other models for network data. A possible reason for this is due to the limited possibilities for this model for accounting for (and explicitly modeling) structural dependence beyond the dyad as can be done in exponential random graph models. Another motive, however, may lie in the computational difficulties existing to estimate such models by means of the methods proposed in the literature, such as joint maximization methods and Bayesian methods. The aim of this article is to investigate maximum likelihood estimation based on the Laplace approximation approach, that can be refined by importance sampling. Practical implementation of such methods can be performed in an efficient manner, and the article provides details on a software implementation using R. Numerical examples and simulation studies illustrate the methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruggero Bellio & Nicola Soriani, 2021. "Maximum likelihood estimation based on the Laplace approximation for p2 network regression models," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 75(1), pages 24-41, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:75:y:2021:i:1:p:24-41
    DOI: 10.1111/stan.12223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12223
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/stan.12223?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kristensen, Kasper & Nielsen, Anders & Berg, Casper W. & Skaug, Hans & Bell, Bradley M., 2016. "TMB: Automatic Differentiation and Laplace Approximation," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 70(i05).
    2. Krivitsky, Pavel N. & Handcock, Mark S., 2008. "Fitting Latent Cluster Models for Networks with latentnet," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 24(i05).
    3. H. E. Ogden, 2017. "On asymptotic validity of naive inference with an approximate likelihood," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 104(1), pages 153-164.
    4. Christian Brinch, 2012. "Efficient simulated maximum likelihood estimation through explicitly parameter dependent importance sampling," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 13-28, March.
    5. Skaug, Hans J. & Fournier, David A., 2006. "Automatic approximation of the marginal likelihood in non-Gaussian hierarchical models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 699-709, November.
    6. Robert Cudeck, 2005. "Fitting Psychometric Models with Methods Based on Automatic Differentiation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 599-617, December.
    7. Ting Yan & Jinfeng Xu, 2013. "A central limit theorem in the β-model for undirected random graphs with a diverging number of vertices," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 100(2), pages 519-524.
    8. Noh, Maengseok & Lee, Youngjo, 2007. "REML estimation for binary data in GLMMs," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(5), pages 896-915, May.
    9. Hunter, David R. & Goodreau, Steven M. & Handcock, Mark S., 2008. "Goodness of Fit of Social Network Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 248-258, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ben C. Stevenson & Rachel M. Fewster & Koustubh Sharma, 2022. "Spatial correlation structures for detections of individuals in spatial capture–recapture models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 963-973, September.
    2. Devin S. Johnson & Brian M. Brost & Mevin B. Hooten, 2022. "Greater Than the Sum of its Parts: Computationally Flexible Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(2), pages 382-400, June.
    3. Cristiano Varin & Manuela Cattelan & David Firth, 2016. "Statistical modelling of citation exchange between statistics journals," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 179(1), pages 1-63, January.
    4. Joshua Daniel Loyal & Yuguo Chen, 2020. "Statistical Network Analysis: A Review with Applications to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(2), pages 419-440, August.
    5. Ingrid Sandvig Thorsen & Bård Støve & Hans J. Skaug, 2023. "A TMB Approach to Study Spatial Variation in Weather-Generated Claims in Insurance," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 1-27, December.
    6. William H. Aeberhard & Eva Cantoni & Chris Field & Hans R. Künsch & Joanna Mills Flemming & Ximing Xu, 2021. "Robust estimation for discrete‐time state space models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(4), pages 1127-1147, December.
    7. Øystein Sørensen & Anders M. Fjell & Kristine B. Walhovd, 2023. "Longitudinal Modeling of Age-Dependent Latent Traits with Generalized Additive Latent and Mixed Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 456-486, June.
    8. Håvard Rue & Sara Martino & Nicolas Chopin, 2009. "Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(2), pages 319-392, April.
    9. Zack W Almquist, 2020. "Large-scale spatial network models: An application to modeling information diffusion through the homeless population of San Francisco," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(3), pages 523-540, March.
    10. Zheng, Nan & Cadigan, Noel, 2021. "Frequentist delta-variance approximations with mixed-effects models and TMB," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    11. Cole C Monnahan & Kasper Kristensen, 2018. "No-U-turn sampling for fast Bayesian inference in ADMB and TMB: Introducing the adnuts and tmbstan R packages," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-10, May.
    12. Anna Malinovskaya & Philipp Otto, 2021. "Online network monitoring," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(5), pages 1337-1364, December.
    13. Michael Braun & André Bonfrer, 2011. "Scalable Inference of Customer Similarities from Interactions Data Using Dirichlet Processes," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 513-531, 05-06.
    14. Katie Wilson & Jon Wakefield, 2022. "A probabilistic model for analyzing summary birth history data," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 47(11), pages 291-344.
    15. Meza, Cristian & Jaffrézic, Florence & Foulley, Jean-Louis, 2009. "Estimation in the probit normal model for binary outcomes using the SAEM algorithm," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1350-1360, February.
    16. Per Block & Christoph Stadtfeld & Tom A. B. Snijders, 2019. "Forms of Dependence: Comparing SAOMs and ERGMs From Basic Principles," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 48(1), pages 202-239, February.
    17. Koenig, Michael & Hsieh, Chih-Sheng & Liu, Xiaodong & Zimmermann, Christian, 2018. "Superstar Economists: Coauthorship networks and research output," CEPR Discussion Papers 13239, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Sándor Juhász, 2021. "Spinoffs and tie formation in cluster knowledge networks," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1385-1404, April.
    19. Andre Python & Andreas Bender & Marta Blangiardo & Janine B. Illian & Ying Lin & Baoli Liu & Tim C.D. Lucas & Siwei Tan & Yingying Wen & Davit Svanidze & Jianwei Yin, 2022. "A downscaling approach to compare COVID‐19 count data from databases aggregated at different spatial scales," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(1), pages 202-218, January.
    20. Simon N. Wood, 2020. "Inference and computation with generalized additive models and their extensions," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 29(2), pages 307-339, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:75:y:2021:i:1:p:24-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.